Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:13:25.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural Stability of Iron Oxide Nanotubes and an Enhancement of Photo Induced Current Detected in the Complex with Fullerenols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2014

Shunji Bandow
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Chemistry, Meijo University, 1-501 Shiogamaguchi, Tenpaku, Nagoya 468-8502, Japan
Yuki Shiraki
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Chemistry, Meijo University, 1-501 Shiogamaguchi, Tenpaku, Nagoya 468-8502, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Iron oxide nanotubes (Fe-ox-NTs) were prepared by a sol-gel technique using a mixture of an Fe(NO3)3·9H2O and a Pluronic F-127 nonionic surfactant in 1-propanol, gelatinizing at 35 °C for 5 days. Crude nanotubes thus obtained were well rinsed by deionized water in order to remove the surfactant. Transmission electron microscopy showed that the products have tubule structure with the outer (inner) diameter ∼10-15 (∼5-10) nm and the length ∼100 nm. X-ray diffraction profile of the crude nanotubes indicated a broadened feature characteristic for a defective or amorphous-like material, and whose profile may associate with the structure of ɣ-Fe2O3 (maghemite). By heating the crude nanotubes in open air, a phase transition occurs in a defective ɣ-Fe2O3 and its structure changes to a relaxed α-Fe2O3 (hematite) without morphological transformation. A further increase of the temperature results a destruction of the tube structure to the spherical nanoparticles without changing the crystallographic structure. A structurally relaxed Fe-ox-NT complex with fullerenols (C60(OH)n, n∼20) has larger photosensitive response under visible light irradiation, but the crude and defective Fe-ox-NTs and their complexes with fullerenols do not indicate noticeable response.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Zhang, Q., Lima, D.Q., Lee, I., Zaera, F., Chi, M. and Yin, Y., Angew. Chem. 123, 7226 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talapin, D.V., Lee, J.S., Kovalenko, M.V. and Shevchenko, E.V., Chem. Rev. 110, 389 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menagen, G., Macdonald, J.E., Shemesh, Y., Popov, I. and Banin, U.J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17406 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemann, M.U., Srinivasan, S.S., Phani, A.R., Kumar, A., Goswami, D.Y. and Stefanakos, E.K., J. Nanomater. 2008, Article ID 950967; doi:10.1155/2008/950967.Google Scholar
Khajeh, M., Laurent, S. and Dastafkan, K., Chem. Rev. 113, 7728 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. and Mao, S.S., Chem. Rev. 107, 289 (2007).Google Scholar
Liu, S., Zhang, L., Zhou, J., Xiang, J., Sun, J. and Guan, J., Chem. Mater. 20, 3623 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suber, L., Imperatori, P., Ausanio, G., Fabbri, F. and Hofmeister, H., J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 7103 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar