Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:56:27.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural and Physical Characterisation of Zinc Oxide Thin Films Prepared from Zinc Acetate via the Sol-gel Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Shane O'Brien
Affiliation:
[email protected], University College Cork, Tyndall National Insistute, Lee Maltings, Prospect row, Cork, Ireland, Ireland
Lee H.K. Koh
Affiliation:
[email protected], University College Cork, Tyndall National Institute, Lee Maltings, Prospect Row, Cork, N/A, Ireland
Mehmet Copuroglu
Affiliation:
[email protected], University College Cork, Tyndall National Institute, Lee Maltings, Prospect Row, Cork, N/A, Ireland
Gabriel M. Crean
Affiliation:
[email protected], University College Cork, Tyndall National Institute, Lee Maltings, Prospect Row, Cork, N/A, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

The influence of zinc acetate concentration in the range 0.3 – 1.3M and annealing temperature in the range 450 – 550°C on the microstructure of zinc oxide films prepared by the sol-gel method was investigated. Zinc acetate concentration of the sol-gel deposited was found to be the major influence on the microstructure and in particular c-axis or (002) preferred orientation of the resulting film, due to its impact on film thickness, for a single sol-gel deposition employing fixed deposition conditions. Preferentially (002) orientated films were obtained from 0.3M zinc acetate sol-gels. However, an increase in zinc acetate concentration resulted in an increase in film thickness and a loss of preferentially (002) orientation. It was found that thick preferentially (002) oriented films could be produced by using multiple depositions of a 0.7M zinc acetate sol-gel using higher drying temperatures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nunes, P., Costa, D., Fortunato, E. and Martins, R., Vacuum. 64, 2002, 293.Google Scholar
2. Look, D.C., Reynolds, D.C., Litton, C.W., Jones, R.L., Eason, D.B. and Gantwell, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81(10), 2002, 1830.Google Scholar
3. Tominaga, K., Takao, T., Fukushima, A., Moriga, T. and Nakabayashi, I., Vacuum. 66, 2002, 505.10.1016/S0042-207X(02)00123-9Google Scholar
4. Naghavi, N., Marcel, C., Dupont, L., Rougier, A., Leriche, J.B. and Guery, C., J. Mater. Chem. 10, 2000, 2315.Google Scholar
5. Krunks, M. and Mellikov, E., Thin Solid Films. 270, 1995, 33.10.1016/0040-6090(95)06893-7Google Scholar
6. McGlynn, E., Fryar, J., Tobin, G., Roy, C., Henry, M.O., Mosnier, J-P., Posada, E. de and Lunney, J.G., Thin Solid Films, 458(2004)330 Google Scholar
7. Shuler, T. and Aegerter, M.A., Thin Solid Films. 351, 1999, 125.10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00211-4Google Scholar
8. Koh, L.H.K., O'Brien, S., Lovera, P., Redmond, G. and Crean, G.M., Proc. MRS 2006 Fall Meeting Boston, Symposium K, Paper no. 0957-K10-33Google Scholar
9. O'Brien, S., Koh, L.H.K. and Crean, G.M., Thin Solid Films (2007), doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.160Google Scholar