Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T00:38:10.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural and Magnetic Properties of Cobal Ferrite - Barium Titanate Nanotube Arrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2011

Dario Bueno-Baques ,
Veronica Corral-Flores ,
Norma A. Morales-Carrillo ,
Alejandro Torres ,
Hector Camacho-Montes  and
Ronald F. Ziolo
Dario Bueno-Baques
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials, Research center for applied chemistry, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico.
Veronica Corral-Flores
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials, Research center for applied chemistry, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico.
Norma A. Morales-Carrillo
Affiliation:
Instituto Tecnologico de Saltillo, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico
Alejandro Torres
Affiliation:
FIME, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
Hector Camacho-Montes
Affiliation:
Institute for Engineering and Technology, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juarez, Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico
Ronald F. Ziolo
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials, Research center for applied chemistry, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico.
Get access

Abstract

Cobalt Ferrite/Barium Titanate nanotube arrays were obtained in anodic aluminum oxide templates (AAO) of 100 nm pore diameter by a two step sol-gel process. Each phase was grown in several wetting – drying cycles starting from the cobalt ferrite layers with the barium titanate on top. As-dried composite structures were sintered at 700 C. The composite nanotubes showed a fine polycrystalline microstructure with an average grain size of 5 nm. The formation of both spinel and perovskite structures was verified by High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HR-TEM) on isolated nanotubes. The growing rate by layer was found to be lower for the BaTiO3 on top of CoFe2O4 than the later on top of the AAO. Wall sizes were estimated by Z-contrast as 9.8 nm for one layer of CoFe2O4 and 6.6 nm for six layers of BaTiO3. Magnetic properties were studied by VSM. Samples showed ferromagnetic behavior with low coercive values. By means of a finite element model the deformation and stress on the piezoelectric phase was estimated and used to simulate the magnetization reversal under stress in the composite nanotubes, using an updated micromagnetic framework to include the magnetostriction effect. Simulation results showed that a curling mode is expected with opposite vortex states at the end of the nanotubes. The change in the vortex domain structure under voltage driven applied stress is presented and discussed.

Keywords

compositemagnetic propertiespiezoelectric
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1368: Symposium WW – Multiferroic, Ferroelectric, and Functional Materials, Interfaces and Heterostructures , 2011 , mrss11-1368-ww01-08
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Fiebig, M., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 (2005) R123–R152.Google Scholar
2. Fuentes-Cobas, L.E., Matutes-Aquino, J.A. and Fuentes-Montero, M.E., “Magnetoelectricity” in Handbook of Magnetic Materials 19 edited by Buschow, K. H. J. (Elsevier 2011) pp. 129–229.Google Scholar
3. Ryu, Jungho, Priya, Shashank, Uchino, Kenji, Kim, Hyoun-ee, J. Electroceramics 8 (2002) pp. 107–119.Google Scholar
4. Zhai, J, Cai, N, Shi, Z, Lin, Y, Nan, C-W. J Phys D: Appl Phys 37 (2004) pp. 823 Google Scholar
5. Ryu, J, Priya, S, Uchino, K, Kim, H. J Electroceramics 8 (2002) pp. 107 Google Scholar
6. Srinivasan, G.. Cond Mat (2004); arXiv:cond-mat/0401607 Google Scholar
7. Nersessian, N., Or, S.W., Carman, G.P.. IEEE Trans Magn 40–4 (2004) pp. 2646 Google Scholar
8. Liu, G., Nan, C. W., Sun, J., Acta Materialia 54 (2006) pp. 917–925.Google Scholar
9. Scholz, W., Fidler, J., Schrefl, T., Suess, D., Dittrich, R., Forster, H., Tsiantos, V., Comp. Mat. Sci. 28 (2003) pp. 366–383.Google Scholar
10. Han, X. F., Shamaila, S., Sharif, R., Chen, J. Y., Liu, H. R., and Liu, D. P., Adv. Mater. 21 (2009) pp. 4619–4624 Google Scholar