Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:48:09.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress Transients Generated by Excimer-Laser Irradiation of Polyimide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

A. D. Zweig
Affiliation:
Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
V. Venugopalan
Affiliation:
Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
T. F. Deutsch
Affiliation:
Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
Get access

Abstract

We measure the stress transients resulting from pulsed excimer laser irradiation of polyimide at 351, 308, 248 and 193 nm, using thin (9 μm) piezoelectric PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) films. We find that fluences between 3·10−3 and 102 J/cm2 generate peak stresses between 104 and 109 Pa. Further, the results show three ranges of fluence where different physical mechanisms mediate the stress generation. In the lowest range of fluence, subsurface thermal decomposition (for λ = 351 and 308 nm) and photodecomposition (for λ = 248 and 193 nm) govern the generation of the observed stresses. At higher fluences we identify two regimes, independent of laser wavelength, where the gas dynamic expansion of the ablation products and plasma formation and expansion, are responsible for the generated stresses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Srinivasan, R. and Braren, B., Chem. Rev. 89, 1303 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Trokel, S., J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 15, 373 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Yashima, Y., McAuliffe, D. J., Jaques, S. L., and Flotte, T. J., Lasers Surg. Med. 11, 62 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Doukas, A. G., McAuliffe, D. J., and Flotte, T. J., Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. (To appear).Google Scholar
5. Dyer, P. E. and Srinivasan, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 445 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Schoeffmann, H., Schmidt-Kloiber, H., and Reichel, E., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 46 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Bushnell, J. C. and McCloskey, D. J., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 5541 (1968).Google Scholar
8. Srinivasan, R., Science 234, 559 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Griffin, R. D., Justus, B. L., Campillo, A. J., and Goldberg, L. S., J. Appi. Phys. 59, 1968 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Dyer, P. E. and AI-Dhahir, R. K., SPIE Laser-Tissue Interaction 1202, 46 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Zweig, A. D., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 1684 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Venugopalan, V., Nishioka, N. S., and Mikid, B. B., ASME J. Biomech. Eng. (To appear).Google Scholar
13. Phipps, C. R. Jr. et al., J.Appl. Phys. 64, 1083 (1988).Google Scholar