Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:12:35.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strained InGaAs/GaAs quantum wells with a 1.3 µm bandedge at room temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

P. Melman
Affiliation:
Gte Laboratories Inc.40 Sylvan Rd.Waltham MA. 02254
B. Elman
Affiliation:
Gte Laboratories Inc.40 Sylvan Rd.Waltham MA. 02254
C. Jagannath
Affiliation:
Gte Laboratories Inc.40 Sylvan Rd.Waltham MA. 02254
Emil S. Koteles
Affiliation:
Gte Laboratories Inc.40 Sylvan Rd.Waltham MA. 02254
A. Silletti
Affiliation:
Gte Laboratories Inc.40 Sylvan Rd.Waltham MA. 02254
Get access

Abstract

The fabrication of long wavelength opto-electronic devices on GaAs substrates is an attractive method for the monolithic integration of optical and electronic devices on a single chip for applications in telecommunications. InGaAs strained layer quantum wells provide one way of engineering the bandgap needed for 1.3 µm devices at room temperature. We have grown and characterized quantum well structures with bandgap of .96 eV using a novel technique, called spatial strain separation, to avoid the stringent limitation of critical thickness which limits the achievable bandgap in this material system. Moreover we have studied the stability of such structures with respect to thermal processing, including oven and rapid thermal annealing. We have observed no degradation of the quantum wells after thermal annealing as judged from the PL spectra shown here.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1Gershoni, D., Vandenberg, J.M., Hamm, R.A., Temkin, H., and Panish, M.B., Phys. Rev. B36, 1320 (1987).Google Scholar
2Yablonovitch, E. and Kane, E.O., IEEE JLT-4, 504, 1986.Google Scholar
3Fekete, D., Chan, K.T., Ballantyne, J.M., and Eastman, L.F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 1659, (1986).Google Scholar
4York, P.K., Beernink, K.J., Fernandez, G.E. and Coleman, J.J., 1989 Topical Meeting Digest on Quantum Wells for Optics and Optoelectronics.Google Scholar
5Kolbas, R.M., Anderson, N.G., Laidig, W.D., Sin, Yongkun, Lo, Y.C., Hsieh, K.Y. and Yang, Y.J., IEEE JQE-24, 1605, (1988).Google Scholar
6Coleman, J.J., 1989 Topical Meeting Digest on Quantum Wells for Optics and Optoelectronics.Google Scholar
7Rogers, D.L., Woodall, J.M., Pettit, G.D., and Mcinturff, D., IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 9, 515, (1988).Google Scholar
8Andersson, T.G., Chen, Z.G., Kulakovskii, V.D., Udin, A., and Vallin, J.T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 752, (1987).Google Scholar
9Matthews, J.W. and Blakeslee, A.E., J. Cryst. Growth 27, 118, (1974).Google Scholar
10Elman, B., Koteles, Emil S., Jagannath, C., Melman, P., Dugger, D., to be submitted for publication to Appl. Phys. Lett.Google Scholar
11Abstreiter, G., 1989 Topical Meeting Digest on Quantum Wells for Optics and Optoelectronics.Google Scholar