Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:31:51.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

STM Nanospectroscopic Study of Defects in Semiconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Koji Maeda
Affiliation:
Dept of Appl. Phys., School of Eng., the Univ. of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN
Akira Hida
Affiliation:
Dept of Appl. Phys., School of Eng., the Univ. of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN
Yutaka Mera
Affiliation:
Dept of Appl. Phys., School of Eng., the Univ. of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

Coupling of scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) with various schemes of optical spectroscopy was found to provide powerful tools for study of crystalline defects in bulk semiconducting solids. The simplest method was applied to a subsurface defect in a bulk GaAs crystal in which the signal was acquired by detecting the change in the tunneling current reflecting a local surface swelling that occurs when the wavelength of the chopped light used for spectroscopic measurements coincides with a photoabsorption spectral peak of the defect. Another scheme using a continuous light of variable wavelength was applied to midgap centers, assigned as arsenic antisite defects, densely populated in low-temperature-grown GaAs epifilms. Experiments at 90K revealed that light illumination causes reversible transformation of the individual defects to a metastable state with an excitation spectrum very close to one observed for the photo-quenching effect of EL2 centers in bulk GaAs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hida, A., Mera, Y. and Maeda, K.; Physica B 308-310, 738 (2001)Google Scholar
2. Hida, A., Mera, Y., and Maeda, K.; Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 3190 (2001)Google Scholar
3. Hida, A., Mera, Y., and Maeda, K.; Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 3029 (2001)Google Scholar
4. Feenstra, R. M. at al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1176 (1993)Google Scholar
5. Capaz, R. B. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1811 (1995); S. B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 60, 4462 (1999)Google Scholar
6. Fisher, D. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 1751 (1987)Google Scholar
7. Grandidier, B. et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3142 (2000)Google Scholar
8.for review, see: Kaminska, M. and Weber, E. R. in Semiconductors and Semimetals vol. 38, edited by Weber, E. R., (Academic Press, Boston, 1993) p. 5989.Google Scholar
9. Pollak, F. H. and Cardona, M., Phys. Rev. 142, 530 (1966)Google Scholar
10. Frova, A. et al., Phys. Rev. 145, 575 (1966)Google Scholar
11. Hida, A., Mera, Y. and Maeda, K.; Physica B 308-310, 1145 (2001)Google Scholar
12.for review, see: Grafström, S., J. Appl. Phys. 91, 1717 (2002)Google Scholar