Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:17:12.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stabilization of Optical Molecules Using Dendritic Boxes against Singlet Oxygen in Photobleaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Sonoko Otomo
Affiliation:
Kansai Advanced Research Center, Communications Research Laboratory, Kobe, 651-2492, Japan
Akira Otomo
Affiliation:
Kansai Advanced Research Center, Communications Research Laboratory, Kobe, 651-2492, Japan
Shinro Mashiko
Affiliation:
Kansai Advanced Research Center, Communications Research Laboratory, Kobe, 651-2492, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The stabilizing effect of dendritic boxes (DBoxes) as a means to protect against photo- degradation of encapsulated dye molecules was experimentally investigated. We focused on photoinduced oxidation and studied the ability of DBoxes to protect dyes inside them from reactive singlet oxygen. Rubrene was captured in a DBox, and then the box was closed at the surface by other stable molecules. A singlet oxygen generator was added to a Rubrene solution to exaggerate photo-oxidation in the complicated total-photodegradation process, and then the solution was exposed to a laser beam to generate singlet oxygen. Bleaching of the encapsulated Rubrene in a DBox was 50 times slower than that of Rubrene alone. We also compared the dependence of surface molecules of a DBox with other kinds of molecules that have different efficiencies of quenching singlet oxygen. Further improved stability was observed by attaching singlet-oxygen-quencher molecules on the DBox surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Drexhage, K. H., in Dye Lasers, edited by Schäfer, F. P. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973), Topics in Applied Physics Vol. 1, Chap. 4, 99. 147-152.Google Scholar
2. Prasad, P. N. and Williams, D. J., Introduction to Nonlinear Optical Effects in Molecules & Polymers (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991), Chap. 7, pp. 132174; Chap. 10, pp. 222-251.Google Scholar
3. Mortazavi, M., Yoon, H. and Teng, C., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 4871 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Cha, M., Torruellas, W., Stegeman, G. and Horsthuis, W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 2648 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Zhang, Q., Canva, M. and Stegeman, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 912 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Chow, H.-F., Mong, T. K.-K., Nongrum, M. F. and Wan, C.-W., Tetrahedron 54, 8543 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Newkome, G. R., He, E. and Moorefield, C. N., Chem. Rev. 99, 1689 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Archut, A. and Vögtle, F., Chem. Soc. Rev. 27, 233 (1999).Google Scholar
9. Jansen, J. F. G. A., Berg, E. M. M. de Brabander-van den and Meijer, E. W., Science 266, (1994); J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 4417 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Miklis, P., Çagin, T. and Goddard, W. A. III, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 7458 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Otomo, A., thesis, M. S., University of Central Florida, 1993; A. Otomo, G. I. Stegeman, W. Horsthuis and G. Möhlmann, in Polymers for Second-Order nonlinear Optics, edited by G. A. Lindsay and K. D. Singer, ASC Symp. Ser. 601, 469-483 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Dubois, A., Canva, M., Brun, A., Chaput, F., and Boilot, J.-P., Appl. Opt. 35, 3193 (1996).Google Scholar