Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:46:34.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stability of Chemically Crosslinked Microtubules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Andrew K. Boal ,
Susan B. Rivera ,
Nicholas E. Miller ,
George D. Bachand  and
Bruce C. Bunker
Andrew K. Boal
Affiliation:
Biomolecular Materials and Interfaces, MS1413 Sandia National Laboratory PO Box 5800 Albuquerque, NM 87123, USA
Susan B. Rivera
Affiliation:
Biomolecular Materials and Interfaces, MS1413 Sandia National Laboratory PO Box 5800 Albuquerque, NM 87123, USA
Nicholas E. Miller
Affiliation:
Biomolecular Materials and Interfaces, MS1413 Sandia National Laboratory PO Box 5800 Albuquerque, NM 87123, USA
George D. Bachand
Affiliation:
Biomolecular Materials and Interfaces, MS1413 Sandia National Laboratory PO Box 5800 Albuquerque, NM 87123, USA
Get access

Abstract

Microtubules (MT) are dynamic protein-based polymers with numerous applications in materials science including the active transport of nanomaterials and as templates for biomimetic materials synthesis. Some of these applications require that the dynamic nature of the MT be suppressed, and in this report we will discuss the preparation and stability of chemically crosslinked microtubules (CLMTs). MT reaction with gluteraldehyde results in the formation of protein dimers and higher molecular weight oligimers as observed by gel electrophoresis, confirming the formation of covalent inter-protein linkages. While extensive crosslinking was found to destabilize MTs and inactivate them with regards to kinesin binding, moderate amounts of crosslinking lead to CLMTs that had functional lifetimes of at least twice that of uncrosslinked MTs. Further studies demonstrated that CLMTs exhibited a wider thermal stability window and were far more resistant to metal-ion induced depolymerization than uncrosslinked MTs.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 826: Symposium V – Proteins as Materials , 2004 , V3.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Howard, J. Mechanics of the Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton, Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA, 2001.Google Scholar
2. Clemmens, J.; Hess, H.; Lipscomb, R.; Hanein, Y.; Bohringer, K. F.; Matzke, C. M.; Bachand, G. D.; Bunker, B. C.; Vogel, V. Langmuir, 2003, 19, 10967–10974.Google Scholar
3. Behrens, S.; Rahn, K.; Habicht, W.; Böhm, K.-J.; Rösner, H.; Dinjus, E.; Unger, E. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 1621–1625.Google Scholar
4. Boal, A. K.; Headley, T. J.; Tissot, R. G.; Bunker, B. C. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2004, 14, 19–24.Google Scholar
5. Drewes, G.; Ebneth, A.; Mandelkow, E.-M. TIBS 1998, 23, 307–311.Google Scholar
6. A previous study of the stability of GA-CLMTs reported only on the enhanced lifetimes of these MTs: Turner, D.; Chang, C. Y.; Fang, K.; Cuomo, P.; Murphy, D. Analyt. Biochem. 1996, 242, 20–25.Google Scholar
7. (a) Svoboda, K.; Schmidt, C. F.; Schnapp, B. J.; Block, S. M. Nature 1993, 365, 721–727. (b) Coy, D. L.; Wagenbach, M.; Howard, J. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 3667-3671.Google Scholar