Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:55:06.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sputter Deposited, Electrically Conductive, Oxidation Resistant Coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Sharon K. Rutledge
Sharon K. Rutledge*
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Rd., Cleveland, OH. 44135
Get access

Abstract

Significant polymer weight loss has been observed due to environmental ashing by atomic oxygen at low earth orbital (LEO) altitudes. Static charging during deployment and charging caused by the space plasma in LEO polar orbits may cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) problems on insulating polymer materials that are integral to such applications as high voltage solar arrays. Simultaneous ion beam sputter deposited coatings of indium-tin-oxide (ITO) with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), carbon, air, or methane were investigated as potential solutions to these problems. The purpose of this research was to improve the flexibility of ITO coatings with these additives and to study the effect the addition of these materials had not only on the flexibility of ITO sputter deposited thin films but also on the conductivity and optical properties.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 54: Symposium E – Thin Films–Interfaces and Phenomena , 1985 , 187
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. NOAA, NASA, and USAF, U.S. Standard Atmosphere, (1976).Google Scholar
2. Leger, L.J., NASA TM-58246, (1982).Google Scholar
3. Banks, B.A., Mirtich, M.J., Rutledge, S.K., Swec, D.M. and Nahra, H.K., NASA TM-87051, (1985).Google Scholar
4. Visentine, J.T., Leger, L.J., Kuminecz, J.F. and Spiker, I.K., AIAA Paper 85–0415, (1985).Google Scholar
5. Spacecraft Environment Section, NASA Lewis Research Center, “Environmental Interaction Considerations for Space Station and Solar Array Design,” Preliminary Report (1985).Google Scholar
6. Lee, A.L., Rhoads, G.D., AIAA Paper 85–1065, (1985).Google Scholar
7. Gussenhoven, M.S., Hardy, D.A., Rich, F. and Burke, W.J., J. Geophysical Research 90, 11009 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Buchanan, M., Webb, J.B. and Williams, D.F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 213 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Ray, S., Banerjee, R., Basu, N., Batabyal, A.K. and Barua, A.K., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 3497 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Muller, H.K., Phys. Stat. Sol. 27, 723 (1968).Google Scholar
11. Ovadyahu, Z., Ovryn, B. and Kramer, H.W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 917 (1983).Google Scholar
12. Purvis, C.K., Garrett, H.B., Whittlesey, A.C. and Stevens, N.J., NASA TP-2361, (1984).Google Scholar