Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:32:25.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Speciation in Size and Density Fractionated Fly Ash III. The influence of HCL Leaching on the Glassy Constituents of a High-Ca Fly Ash

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

E. E. Berry
Affiliation:
Ontario Research Foundation, Sheridan Park, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5K 1B3
R. T. Hemmings
Affiliation:
Ontario Research Foundation, Sheridan Park, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5K 1B3
B. J. Cornelius
Affiliation:
Ontario Research Foundation, Sheridan Park, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5K 1B3
Get access

Abstract

Ash density fractions, separated from a high-Ca fly ash, were leached with 6M HCl at 105°C. The density fractions (<0.79 and >2.85 g.cm−3) selected for leaching have been shown in previous work to consist largely of two different glass types, designated Glass I and Glass II. It was shown that both Glass I and Glass II are leachable to yield solutions containing Al and modifier cations. Acid attack on Glass I appears to involve hydrolysis of Si–O–Al (silalane) bridges along with ion exchange at available non-bridging oxygen sites. Attack on Glass II is more extensive, with both silalane and siloxane bridges being hydrolysed, and ion-exchange occurring at non-bridging oxygens. The products of leaching are aluminosilicates. In the case of Glass I, these remain as pseudomorphic, hollow spheres; whereas, for Glass II, substantial reprecipitation of silica (alumina) gel was found.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hemmings, R.T. and Berry, E.E., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-products: Charactrization. Utilization and Disposal II, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P. and Roy, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symup. Proc Vol. 65 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1986) pp. 91104.Google Scholar
2. Hemmings, R.T., Berry, E.E., Cornelius, B.J. and Scheetz, B.E., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal III, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P. and Roy, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symup. Proc Vol. 86 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1987) pp. 8198.Google Scholar
3. Henmmings, R.T. and Berry, E.E., this volume.Google Scholar
4. Leitch, H., Iverson, H.G. and Clemmer, J.B., Extraction of Alumina by Leaching Melted Ouenched Anorthosite in Sulfuric Acid, USBM, RI 6744, 1966.Google Scholar
5. Canon, R.M., Gilliam, T.M. and Watson, J.S., Evaluation of Potential Processes for Recovery of Metals from Coal Ash, EPRI Report CS-1922, Vols. l and 2, 1981.Google Scholar
6. Wilder, R.F., Barrett, P.J., Henslee, L.W. and Arpi, D., Recovery of Metal Oxides from Fly Ash, EPRI Report CS-3544, 3 vols, June 1984.Google Scholar
7. Wilder, R.F. and Markman, D.L., Recovery of Metal Oxides from Fly Ash. Including Ash Beneficiation Product: Product Market Survey Reptort, EPRI Report CS-2422, May 1985.Google Scholar
8. Berry, E.E., Hemmings, R.T. and Golden, D.M., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal III, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P. and Roy, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc Vol.86 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1987) pp. 365380.Google Scholar
9. Hemmings, R.T. and Berry, E.E., Evaluation of Plastic Filler Applications for Leached Fly Ash, EPRI Report RP 2422-8, May 1985.Google Scholar
10. Hulett, L.D. and Weinberger, A.J., Env. Sci. Technol. 14, 965 (1980); L.D. Hulett, A.J. Weinberger, K.J. Northcutt and N.M. Ferguson, Science 210, 1356 (1980); L.D. Hulett, A.J. Weinberger, N.M. Ferguson, K.J. Northcutt and W.S. Lyon, in Trace Elements and Phase Relations in Fly Ash, EPRI Report EA-1822, May 1981.Google Scholar
11. Iler, R.K., The Chemistry of Silica, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979), p. 511.Google Scholar
12. Murata, K.J. and Schlecht, W.G., US. Geol. Survey Bull. 950, pp. 25–33, 35–82, (1946).Google Scholar