Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:13:53.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solar Cells Using Solution-derived Oxide Films as Photoelectrodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Yanfeng Gao  and
Masayuki Nagai
Yanfeng Gao
Affiliation:
[email protected], Musashi Institute of Technology, Advanced Research laboratories, Todoroki8-15-1, Setagaya-Ku, Tokyo, 158-0082, Japan
Masayuki Nagai
Affiliation:
[email protected], Musashi Institute of Technology, Advanced Research Laboratories, Tokyo, 158-0082, Japan
Get access

Abstract

This paper reports the development of morphology-tuned TiO2/ZnO films and their application to the electrode in dye-sensitized solar cells. Amorphous TiO2 precursor films with different morphologies can be synthesized under different processing conditions by our previously developed peroxotitanate-complex deposition process, which employs a supersaturated peroxotitanate aqueous solution. The ZnO nanowire aligns were grown by a two-step method, in which well oriented arrays of ZnO nanowires were prepared on a pre-prepared ZnO seed layer. The cell performance using the prepared TiO2/ZnO films shows the possibility to integrate these films into solar cells. However, the crystallization and morphology should be further optimized to improve the conversion efficiency to be a competitive level.

Keywords

solution depositionthin filmceramic
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 974: Symposium CC – Solar Energy Conversion , 2006 , 0974-CC08-04
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gao, Y.F., Koumoto, K., Crys. Growth Des. 5(5), 1983 -2017(2005).Google Scholar
2. Mann, S., in “Biomimetic Materials Chemistry”, pp 1–40, VCH Publishers (1996).Google Scholar
3. Hagfeldt, A., Grätzel, M., Chem. Rev. 95, 45 (1995).10.1021/cr00033a003Google Scholar
4. Nazeeruddin, M. K., Kay, A., Rodicio, I., Humphry-Baker, R., Mueller, E., Liska, P., Vlachopoulos, N., Graetzel, M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115(14),6382–6390 (1993).10.1021/ja00067a063Google Scholar
5. Gao, Y.-F., Masuda, Y., Peng, Z.-F., Yonezawa, T., Koumoto, K., J. Mater. Chem. 13, 608–613(2003).Google Scholar
6. Gao, Y.-F., Masuda, Y., Koumoto, K., Chem. Mater. 16, 1062–1067(2004).10.1021/cm030543iGoogle Scholar
7. Gao, Y.-F., Nagai, M., Masuda, Y., Sato, F., Koumoto, K., J. Crys. Growth 286, 445–450 (2005).10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.10.072Google Scholar
8. Gao, Y.-F., Nagai, M., Seo, W.-S., Koumoto, K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., in press.Google Scholar
9. Gao, Y.-F., Nagai, M., Langmuir, 22, 3936–3940 (2006).10.1021/la053042fGoogle Scholar