Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:59:32.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Size-Controlled Synthesis of MgO Nanoparticles and the Assessment of Their Bactericidal Capacity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2013

Yarilyn Cedeño-Mattei
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR 00681-9000, U.S.A. Department of Engineering Science and Materials, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR 00681-9000, U.S.A.
Myrna Reyes
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR 00681-9000, U.S.A.
Oscar Perales-Pérez
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR 00681-9000, U.S.A. Department of Engineering Science and Materials, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR 00681-9000, U.S.A.
Félix R. Román
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR 00681-9000, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The present work focuses on the development of a reproducible and cost-effective size-controlled synthesis route for nanoscale MgO and the preliminary assessment of its bactericide capacity as a function of crystal size. Nanoscale MgO was produced through the thermal decomposition of Mg-carbonate hydrate precursor (hydromagnesite) synthesized in aqueous phase. The exclusive formation of the MgO phase, with an average crystallite size between 7 and 13 ± 1 nm, was evidenced by X-Ray Diffraction and HRTEM analyses. Fourier Transform – Infrared spectroscopy confirmed the evolution of the precursor into the desired MgO structure. The bactericidal tests were conducted by measuring the optical density at 600 nm of E. coli in presence of MgO nanoparticles of specific sizes. MgO nanocrystals with average crystallite sizes of 13nm inhibited bacterial growth up to 35% at 500 mg MgO/L. The mechanism of inhibition could be attributed to the formation of superoxide species on the MgO surface.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Selvamani, T., Sinhamahapatra, A., Bhattacharjya, D., Mukhopadhyay, I., Mat. Chem. Phys. 129, 853 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Z., Wei, L., Yan, T., Zhou, M., Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 3412 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R. and Münstedt, H., Biomaterials 26, 2081 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liau, S.Y., Read, D.C., Pugh, W.J., Furr, J.R., Russell, A.D., Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 25, 279 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Q., Mahendra, S., Lyon, D.Y., Brunet, L., Liga, M.V., Li, D., Alvarez, P.J.J., Water Res. 42, 4591 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bae, Y.-W and Ann, Y.-J., Sci. Total Environ. 409, 1603 (2011).Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Li, F., Zhang, R., Evans, D.G., Duan, X., Chem. Mater. 14, 4286 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullity, B. D, in Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, edited by Cohen, Morris (Addison Wesley, MA, 1972), p. 102.Google Scholar
Downs, R.T. and Hall-Wallace, M., Am. Mineral. 88, 247 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, W.B., Am. Mineral. 56, 46 (1971).Google Scholar
Sawai, J., Kawada, E., Kanou, F., Igarashi, H., Hashimoto, A., Kokugan, T., Shimizu, M., J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 29, 627 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar