Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T10:46:52.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Site Preference of Ternary Additions in Ni3A1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

M. Sluiter ,
M. Takahashi  and
Y. Kawazoe
M. Sluiter
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 980–77 Sendai, Japan
M. Takahashi
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 980–77 Sendai, Japan
Y. Kawazoe
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 980–77 Sendai, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The site preference of a large number of alloying elements in Ni3AI (γ′) was studied in a systematic way by using electronic structure calculations based on the local density approximation. Alloying elements in this intermetallic may occupy exclusively the Ni or Al sublattices, or may exhibit no particular site preference. By performing the calculations both for spin-polarized and non-spin-polarized cases, it was found that magnetism strongly affects the computed site substitution behavior of Mn, Fe, and Co in Ni3Al. In the case of Fe, for example, a preference for the Ni sublattice is computed when magnetic effects are ignored, but when magnetic effects are accounted for it is found that Fe has no significant site preference, in much better agreement with a large number of experimental determinations. Some trends regarding the site preference across the periodic table are shown and discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 364: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys–VI , 1994 , 327
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Chiba, A., Hanada, S. and Watanabe, S., Acta Met. 39, 1799 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Doi, H., Hashimoto, K., Kasahara, K., and Tsujimoto, T., J. Jpn. Inst. Metals 56, 232 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Hashimoto, K., Doi, H., Tsujimoto, T., and Suzuki, T., Mater. Trans. JIM 32, 574 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Wu, Y.P., Tso, N.C., Sanchez, J.M. and Tien, J.K., Acta Met. 37, 2835 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Guard, R.W. and Westbrook, J.H., Trans. Met. Soc. AIME 215, 810 (1959).Google Scholar
6. Ochiai, S., Oya, Y. and Suzuki, T., Acta Met. 32, 289 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Tso, N.C. and Sanchez, J.M., Mat. Sci. Eng. A108, 159 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Wolverton, C. and de Fontaine, D., Phys. Rev. B 49, 12351 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Sluiter, M. and Kawazoe, Y., Phys. Rev B accepted for publication 1995; and references cited therein.Google Scholar
10. Rawlings, R.D. and Staton-Bevan, A.E., J. Mat. Sci. 10, 505 (1975).Google Scholar
11. Takahashi, M., Sluiter, M., and Kawazoe, Y., submitted to Acta Met. (1994).Google Scholar
12. Podloucky, R., Zeller, R., and Dederichs, P. H., Phys. Rev. B 22, 5777 (1980).Google Scholar
13. Ducastelle, F., in Alloy Phase Stability, NATO ASI Series E: Applied Sciences Vol. 163, ed. by Stocks, G.M. and Gonis, A., (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1989), p. 293; and references cited therein.Google Scholar
14. Sluiter, M. and Turchi, P.E.A., Phys. Rev. B 43, 12251 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Ducastelle, F., Order and Phase Stability in Alloys, Cohesion and Structure Series: Vol. 3, ed. by de Boer, F.R. and Pettifor, D.G., (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991), p. 469.Google Scholar
16. Sluiter, M. and Kawazoe, Y., “Magnetic and Chemical Interactions in Metallic Alloys”, in Materials Design By Computer Simulation II, ed. by Kawazoe, Y., accepted for publication in Sci. Rep. RITU, Ser. A40, No. 2 (1994).Google Scholar