Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:44:04.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sintering Behavior of Ultrafine Ceramic Particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

J.E. Bonevich  and
L.D. Marks
J.E. Bonevich
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Evanston, IL 60208
L.D. Marks
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Evanston, IL 60208
Get access

Abstract

Ultrafine particles (UFPs) of aluminum oxide, formed by arc discharge, were sintered in an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) furnace system and characterized by high resolution electron microscopy (HREM) under UHV conditions. The UFPs produced range in size from 20 to 50 nm and have highly faceted surfaces. The atomic structure of the UFPs corresponds to the cubic (γ) and orthorhombic (δ) variants of the spinel structure. In UFPs, surface faceting plays a major role in determining the final sintering geometry with sintering occurring predominantly on the closed-packed (111) facets. Surface diffusion is the predominant mechanism for sintering, as evidenced by the fact that many sintered particles have their initial adhesion structure ‘;lockedin’ during sintering with no reorientation occurring. Furthermore, the necks formed during sintering have well-defined, atomically-sharp contact angles suggesting that the neck growth process is controlled by the faceted structures and may be modeled by a mechanism similar to crystal growth due to ledges, grain boundaries, and twins. The driving force for sintering can be considered as a chemical potential difference between facet surfaces and the neck region.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 286: Symposium J – Nanophase and Nanocomposite Materials , 1992 , 3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Karch, J., Birringer, R. and Gleiter, H., Nature 330, 556 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Siegel, R.W. et al. , J. Mater. Res. 3, 1367 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Thomas, G.J., Siegel, R.W. and Eastman, J.A., Scripta Metall. 24, 201 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Wunderlich, W., Ishida, Y. and Maurer, R., Scripta Metall. 24, 403 (1990).Google Scholar
5. lijima, S., Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 23, L347 (1984); J. Electron Microsc. 34, 249 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Warble, C.E., J. Mater. Sci. 20, 2512 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Nieman, G.W., Weertman, J.R. and Siegel, R.W., J. Mater. Res. 6, 1012 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Chokshi, A.H., Rosen, A., Karch, J. and Gleiter, H., Scripta Metall. 23, 1679 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Kimoto, K. and Nishida, I., Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 6, 1047 (1967).Google Scholar
10. Bonevich, J.E., Teng, M.H., Johnson, D.L. and Marks, L.D., Rev. Sci. Inst. 62,3061(1991).Google Scholar
11. Bonevich, J.E. and Marks, L.D., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1489 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Bonevich, J.E. and Marks, L.D., Microscopy 22, 95 (1992)Google Scholar
13. Rooksby, H.P., X-ray identification and crystal structures of clay minerals. London: 1951.Google Scholar
14. Lippens, B.C. and deBoer, J.H., Acta Cryst. 17, 1312 (1964).Google Scholar
15. Rooksby, H.P. and Rooymans, C.J.M., Clay Minerals Bull. 4, 234 (1961).Google Scholar
16. Fargeot, D., Mercurio, D. and Dauger, A., Mater. Chem. Phys. 24, 299 (1990).Google Scholar
17. Jayaram, V. and Levi, C.G., Acta Metall. 37, 569 (1989).Google Scholar
18. Bonevich, J.E. and Marks, L.D., Ultramicroscopy 35, 161 (1991).Google Scholar
19. Johnson, D.L., J. Appl. Phys. 40, 192 (1969).Google Scholar
20. Searcy, A.W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68, C267 (1985).Google Scholar
21. Shingu, P.H., Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University, 1967.Google Scholar