Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:46:50.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shape Memory at Nanometer Scales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Carl Pieter Frick
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Colorado, Mechanical Engineering, UCB 427, Boulder, CO, 80309-0427`, United States, (303)735-2478
Travis W. Lang
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Colorado, Mechanical Engineering, United States
Kevin Spark
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Colorado, Mechanical Engineering, United States
Ken Gall
Affiliation:
[email protected], Georgia Tech, Materials Science, United States
Get access

Abstract

Nickel-titanium (NiTi) shape memory alloys undergo relatively large recoverable inelastic deformations via a stress-induced martensitic phase transformation. The nanoindentation experimental results presented in this study are the first to show evidence of discrete forward and reverse stress-induced thermoelastic martensitic transformations in nanometer scaled volumes of material. Shape recovery due to indentation, followed by subsequent heating, is demonstrated for indents depths in the sub 10 nm range via atomic force microscopy. It is also shown that the local material structure can be utilized to modify transformation behavior at nanometer scales, yielding insight into the nature of stress-induced martensitic phase transformations at small scales and providing opportunity for the design of nanometer sized NiTi actuators.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bhattacharya, K. and James, R.D., Science 307, 5354 (2005).Google Scholar
2. Gall, K., Sehitoglu, H., Chumlyakov, Y., and Kireeva, I., Acta Mater. 47, 12031217 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Frick, C.P., Ortega, A.M., Tyber, J., Maier, H.J., El, A.. Maksoud, M., Liu, Y., and Gall, K., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 405, 3449, (2005).Google Scholar
4. Gogotsi, Y., and Domnich, V., High-Pressure Surface Science and Engineering, eds. (Institute of Physics Publishing, Philadelphia) Section 5 (2004).Google Scholar
5. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 19, 320 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Page, T.F., Oliver, W.C., and McHargue, C.J., J. Mater. Res. 7, 450472, (1992).Google Scholar
7. Shaw, G.A., Stone, D.S., Johnson, A.D., Ellis, A.B., and Crone, W.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 257259, (2003).Google Scholar
8. Ni, W., Cheng, Y.-T., and Grummon, D.S., Surf. Coat. Tech. 177–178, 512517, (2004).Google Scholar
9. Shaw, G.A., et al. , Adv. Mater. 17, 11231127, (2005).Google Scholar
10. Ma, X.-G. and Komvopoulos, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 37733775, (2003).Google Scholar