Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:47:36.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Semt-Solid Processing of Titanium Alloys for Biomedical Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

B. Toloui
Affiliation:
The Open University, Dept. of Materials, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK.
J. V. Wood
Affiliation:
The Open University, Dept. of Materials, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Among metallic systems, titanium alloys are prime candidate materials for biomedical applications in view of their apparent properties in the body environment. While machined and forged parts of CPTi, or Ti-6Al-4V, are suitable for many applications, they are not economical for one-off objects or artefacts of extreme intricacy. Titanium castings are an obvious solution to the problem but these are extremely difficult to process without contamination. Alloying allows a lowering of the melting point and significantly reduces the risk of contamination but the resultant alloys are normally brittle due to networks of intermetallics forming. This paper describes a process of semi-solid casting using a powder titanium feedstock for making one-off castings of artefacts like those required in dentistry. The process will be described and the mechanical and corrosion properties of several alloys which are compatible with this technique are assessed. The basic process is relatively inexpensive and provides a useful tool for examining a wide range of potential titanium base alloys.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bothe, R. T., Beaton, L E and Davenport, H A, J. Surg. Gynec. and Obsted. 21, 598 (1940).Google Scholar
2. Hille, G. H., J. of Materials, 1, 373 (1966).Google Scholar
3. Laing, P, Orthopaedic Clinics of North America, 1, 249 (1973).Google Scholar
4. Zwicker, U., Buhler, K. and Muller, R., Proc 4th Int. Conf. on Titanium, edited by Kimura, H. and Izuni, O. (The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Kyoto, Japan, 1980) pp. 505–514.Google Scholar
5. Steinemann, S.G. and Perren, S.M., Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Titanium edited by Lufjering, G., Zuicker, U., and Bunk, W. (Deutch Gesettschaft fur Metallkunde. e.V., Munich, 1985) pp. 1327–1342.Google Scholar
6. Schuyler, D. R., Petrusha, J. A. and Kerr, W. R., Vacuum Metallurgy, (Science Press, N. J. 1977) pp. 475503.Google Scholar
7. Ida, K., Tsutsumi, S. and Togaya, T. in Proc. IADR (1980), abstract only published.Google Scholar
8. Toloui, B. and Wood, J. V., Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Titanium, edited by Lutjering, G., Zwicker, U. and Bunk, W. (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Metallkunde e.V, Munich, 1985) pp. 163–169.Google Scholar
9. Spencer, D. B., Mehrabian, R and Flemings, K C, Met. Trans. 3, 1925 (1972).Google Scholar
10. Flemings, I. C., Riek, R. G. and Young, K. P., Mat. Sci. Eng, 25, 103 (1976).Google Scholar
11. Hears, D.C., Int. Metals Reviews, P.119 (June 1977).Google Scholar
12. Toloui, B. and Wood, J. V., To be published.Google Scholar
13. Hoar, T. P. and Mears, D. C., Proc. Roy. Soc, (London), A294, 486 (1966).Google Scholar