Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:09:08.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second Millennium B.C. Pottery at Hasanlu Tepe and Dinkha Tepe: Inaa and Petrographic Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Leigh-Ann Bedal ,
Stuart Fleming ,
Maude De Schauensee  and
Ronald Hancock
Leigh-Ann Bedal
Affiliation:
Museum Applied Science Center for Archaeology, The University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Stuart Fleming
Affiliation:
Museum Applied Science Center for Archaeology, The University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Maude De Schauensee
Affiliation:
Near East Section, The University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Ronald Hancock
Affiliation:
SLOWPOKE Reactor Facility and Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Canada M5S 1A4
Get access

Abstract

Hasanlu Tepe and Dinkha Tepe are located in the Ushnu-Solduz valley system of northwestern Iran. A comparison of the pottery assemblages of the Late Bronze Age (Has VI and Din IV) and the Early Iron Age (Has V and Din III) at each site shows that there was an abrupt stylistic change from one period to the next, that change being attributed to the migration of a new people into the region, circa 1450 B.C. INAA and petrographic analysis indicates that this cultural change influenced only stylistic aspects of the local pottery tradition: no new clay sources were exploited, no novel tempering practices were introduced. Rather, all the technological differences we can detect relate to variations within the internal organization of pottery production at each site, suggesting the presence of some workshops which specialized in certain ware types. There is also evidence for appreciable movement of finer painted wares from Dinkha to Hasanlu during the Bronze Age.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 352: Symposium – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology IV , 1995 , 453
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Young, T.C. Jr., Iran 3, 53 (1965).Google Scholar
2. Voigt, M.M. and Dyson, R.H. Jr., in Chronologies in Old World Archaeology [3rd edition], edited by Ehrich, R.W. (Chicago Uiversity Press, Chicago, 1993) pp. 174–178.Google Scholar
3. Muscarella, O.W., Bull. MMA 27, 187 (1968).Google Scholar
4. Dyson, R.H., in Le Plateau Iranien et LAsie Centrale des Origines a la Conquete Islamique, Colloques Intemationaux du CNRS 567 (CNRS, Paris 1977) pp. 155–69.Google Scholar
5. Dyson, R.H. Jr., Expedition 31, Fig. 7 (1969).Google Scholar
6. The tungsten content was a measure of potential contamination in samples taken by tungsten carbide drilling. Correlation analysis indicated that cobalt was introduced by such drilling at about 1 ppm Co per 8 ppm W. No other element in this study was affected in this way.Google Scholar
7. Hancock, R.G.V., J. IIC-CG 3, 210 (1978).Google Scholar
8. Kramer, C., in Mountains and Lowlands, edited by Levine, L. and Young, T.C. Jr., (Undena Publications, Malibu, 1977) pp. 91–112.Google Scholar
9. Hamlin, C., J. Persian Stud. 12, 126f and Figs. II, XII, and XIII (1974).Google Scholar
10. Muscarella, O.W., MMA Journal 9, 35 (1974).Google Scholar
11. Dyson, R.H. Jr., J. Near East. Stud. 24, 195f (1965).Google Scholar