Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:49:37.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scratching Behavior of Poly(N-Butyl Acrylate) Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. L. Zhang ,
A. H. Tsou  and
J. C. M. Li
S. L. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
A. H. Tsou
Affiliation:
Manufacturing Research and Engineering, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY 14652
J. C. M. Li
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
Get access

Abstract

Scratch testing was performed on the poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PnBA) films using a spherical indenter. For the uncrosslinked PnBA film, the horizontal force during scratching increases with the normal load and has a residual value (˜ 0.6 g) as the normal load approaches zero. The relation can be fitted by using the JKR theory. With increasing driving speed, the coefficient of friction increases but the rate of increase becomes less. For the crosslinked PnBA film which behaves like an elastomer, the horizontal force approaches zero at zero normal load. Below a critical normal load, which depends on the failure mechanism and the thickness of the film, the crosslinked film recovers elastically after being scratched. Above the critical load, the film is damaged and, depending on the film thickness, shows two distinct damage mechanisms.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 522: Symposium T – Fundamentals of Nanoindentation & Nanotribology , 1998 , 371
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Starmer, P. H., Wolf, F. R., in Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, edited by H. F., Mark, N. M., Bikales, C. G., Overberger, G., Menges and J. I., Kroschwitz (Wiley, New York, 1985), p. 306.Google Scholar
2. Kangjie, Li, Beta Y., Ni and Li, J. C. M., J. Mat. Res. 11, 1574–1580 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Johnson, K. L., Kendall, K., and Roberts, A. D., Proc. R. Soc. London A 324, 301–313 (1971).Google Scholar
4. Grosch, K. A., Proc. R. Soc. London A 274, 21–39 (1963).Google Scholar
5. Williams, M. L., Landel, R. F. and Ferry, J. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77, 3701–3707 (1955).Google Scholar
6. Burnett, P. J. and Rickerby, D. S., Thin Solid Films 157, 233 (1988); 154, 403(1987);Google Scholar
Laugier, M. T., Thin Solid Films, 117, 243(1984).Google Scholar
7. Benjamin, P. and Weaver, C., Proc. R. Soc. London A 254, 163(1960).Google Scholar
8. Hedenquist, Per, Olsson, M. and Jacobson, S., and Soderberg, S., Surface Coatings Technol. 41,31(1990).Google Scholar
9. Bethune, B., J. Mater. Sci. 11, 199(1976);Google Scholar
Leu, H. J. and Scattergood, R. O., J. Mater. Sci., 23, 3006(1988).Google Scholar