Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:25:21.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Schottky Barrier Formation and Long Term Stability of Metal/N-Lnp Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Z. Q. Shi
Affiliation:
Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, 208 Bonner Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
W. A. Anderson
Affiliation:
Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, 208 Bonner Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
Get access

Abstract

The formation of reliable high barrier height Schottky contacts to n-InP is essential for useful device fabrication. Fermi-level pinning traditionally has restricted the application of InP due to large reverse leakage current. Recently, we have proposed the enhancement of Schottky barrier heights (up to 0.98 eV) by deposition with the substrate cooled to low temperature (LT=77K) rather than at room temperature (RT=300K). Studies of the resistance of thin metal films during deposition reveals significant differences in metal nucleation for RT and LT diodes. For the long term stability study, a reverse bias of 2.0V was applied to both RT and LT diodes for more than 1500 hours. Then a constant forward current of 20 mA/cm2 was applied to the diode. The reverse current and forward voltage were recorded as a function of the testing time. After each step the saturation current density (Jo), barrier height (øB), and ideality factor (n) were measured using the current-voltage (I-V) technique. For a LT Au/n-InP diode, the Jo, øB, and n factor were found to be 3.4 × 10−11 A/cm2, 0.98 eV, and 1.31 before testing, and 4.8 × 10−10 A/cm2, 0.92 eV, and 1.31 after testing. The reverse leakage current was nearly constant during the testing. The forward voltage showed a little drop with time. The ultra-high øB and good stability of the LT diodes will be discussed in terms of the interface modification.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hokelek, E. and Robinson, G.Y., Solid State Elect. 24, 99 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Brillson, L.J. and Brucker, C.F., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 21, 564 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Hokelek, E. and Robinson, G.Y., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 5199 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Yamagish, H., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 25, 1691 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Gann, R.G., Geib, K.M., Wilmsen, C.W., Costello, J., Hrychwain, G., and Zeto, R.J., J. App. Phys. 63, 506 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Lee, Y.S. and Anderson, W.A., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 4051 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Shi, Z.Q. and Anderson, W.A., Solid State Elect. 34, 285 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Shi, Z.Q. and Anderson, W., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 3137 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Shi, Z.Q., Wallace, R.L. and Anderson, W.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 446 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Sze, S.M., Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd Ed. (Wiley, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
11. Spicer, W.E., Chye, P.W., Skeath, P.R., Su, C.Y., and Lindau, , J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 16, 1427 (1979).Google Scholar
12. Cao, R., Miyano, K., Kendelwicz, T., Chin, K.K., Lindau, I., and Spicer, W.E., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 5, 938 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Stiles, K. and Kahn, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 440 (1988).Google Scholar
14. Monch, W., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 6, 1270 (1988).Google Scholar
15. Tu, A. and Persans, P.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1506 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Pollak, F.H. and Tsu, R., SPIE, 452, 26 (1988).Google Scholar