Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:11:16.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scanning Force Microscope Studies of Detachment of Nanometer Adhering Particulates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. T. Dickinson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Materials Science Program, Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164–2814, [email protected]
R. F. Hariadi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Materials Science Program, Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164–2814, [email protected]
L. Scudiero
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Materials Science Program, Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164–2814, [email protected]
S. C. Langford
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Materials Science Program, Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164–2814, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We employ salt particles deposited on soda lime glass substrates as a model system for particle detachment in chemically active environments. The chemical activity is provided by water vapor, and detachment is performed with the tip of a scanning force microscope. The later force required to detach nanometer-scale salt particles is a strong function of particle size and relative humidity. The peak lateral force at detachment divided by the nominal particle area yields an effective interfacial shear strength. The variation of shear strength with particle size and humidity is described in terms of chemically assisted crack growth along the salt-glass interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tam, A. C., Leung, W. P., Zapka, W., and Ziemlich, W., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 35153523 (1992).10.1063/1.350906Google Scholar
2. Tam, A. C., Park, H. K., and Grigoropoulos, C. P., Appl. Surf. Sci. 127–129, 721725 (1998).10.1016/S0169-4332(97)00788-5Google Scholar
3. Nanz, G. and Camilletti, L. E., IEEE Trans. Semiconductor Manufacturing 8, 382389 (1995).10.1109/66.475179Google Scholar
4. Lawn, B., Fracture of brittle solids, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993), Chapter 5.10.1017/CBO9780511623127Google Scholar
5. Meyer, E., Luthi, R., Howald, L., and Bammerlin, M., in Micro/Nanotribology and its Applications, edited by B., Bhusan (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1997), pp. 193215.10.1007/978-94-011-5646-2_12Google Scholar
6. Junno, T., Deppert, K., Montelius, L., and Samuelson, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 36273629 (1995).10.1063/1.113809Google Scholar
7. Lebreton, C. and Wang, Z. Z., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14, 13561359 (1996).10.1116/1.589097Google Scholar
8. Park, N.-S., Kim, M.-W., Langford, S. C., and Dickinson, J. T., J. Appl. Phys. 80, 26802686 (1996).10.1063/1.363185Google Scholar
9. Scudiero, L., Langford, S. C., and Dickinson, J. T., Tribology Lett. 6, 4155 (1999).10.1023/A:1019134901387Google Scholar
10. Hutchinson, J. W., personal communication (1998).Google Scholar