Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:29:31.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scalings of A + B Reaction Kinetics due to Anisotropic Confinements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Panos Argyrakis
Affiliation:
Departments of Chemistry and Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1055 Department of Physics, University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
Jaewook Ahn
Affiliation:
Departments of Chemistry and Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1055
Anna Lin
Affiliation:
Departments of Chemistry and Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1055
Raoul Kopelman
Affiliation:
Departments of Chemistry and Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1055
Get access

Abstract

We report on the diffusion-limited A + B reaction in highly anisotropic spaces. In addition to the highly non-classical behavior of the density of reactants predicted for isotropic spaces, we observe a dimensional crossover in A + B → 0 reactions due to the geometrical compactness of the tubular 2- and 3-dimensional spaces (baguettelike structures). For slabs, we find the crossover time Tc. = Wα, which scales as , where a, b and β are given by the earlier and the late time inverse density scalings of ρ− 1 ˜-, ta and ρ−1 - tbWβ, respectively. We also obtain a critical width W, below which the chemical reaction progresses without traversing a 2- or 3-dimensional Ovchinnikov-Zeldovich reaction regime. We find that there exist different hierarchies of dimensionally forced crossovers, depending on the initial conditions and geometric restrictions. Kinetic phase diagrams are employed and exponents are given for the A + B elementary reactions in various euclidean geometries. Monte-Carlo simulations illustrate some of the kinetic hierarchies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Ovchinnikov, A. A. and Zeldovich, Y. G., Chem. Phys. B 28 215 (1978).Google Scholar
[2] Kang, K., Redner, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 955 (1984).Google Scholar
[3] Anacker, L. W. and Kopelman, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 289 (1987).Google Scholar
[4] Lindenberg, K., West, B. J., and Kopelman, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1777 (1988).Google Scholar
[5] A. Lin, Kopelman, R., and Argyrakis, P., Phys. Rev. E. 53 1502 (1996).Google Scholar
[6] A. Lin, L., Kopelman, R. and Argyrakis, P., J. Phys. Chem. A 101 802 (1997).Google Scholar
[7] Li, J., Phys. Rev. E. 55 6646 (1997).Google Scholar
[8] Kopelman, R., Lin, A. L., and Argyrakis, P., Phys. Lett. A 232 34 (1997).Google Scholar
[9] A. Lin, L., Kopelman, R., and Argyrakis, P., Phys. Rev. E 56 6204 (1997).Google Scholar
[10] Linde, D. and A.Mezhlumian, Phys. Rev. D 49 1783 (1994).Google Scholar
[11] Ahn, J., Kopelman, R., and Argyrakis, P., J. Chem. Phys. 110 xxxx (1999).Google Scholar
[12] Lindenberg, K., Argyrakis, P., and Kopelman, R., in Fluctuations and Order: the New Synthesis, Millonas, M., ed. Springer, Berlin 1996, p. 171.Google Scholar
[13] Lindenberg, K., Argyrakis, P., and Kopelman, R., J. Phys. Chem. 98 3389 (1994).Google Scholar