Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:52:49.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of the Surface of Glass Reinforcement Fibers on Their Physical Properties and Performance in Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Albert A. Kruger
Albert A. Kruger*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11210
Get access

Abstract

The widely held explanation for mechanical failure of silicate and silica glasses rests upon the existence of Griffith-flaw and associated free ion diffusion concepts used to model crack growth. However, this theory has consistently failed to provide complete agreement with the experimental results. This dilemma coupled with the reports of single-valued strengths in fibers cannot be rationalized by the modification of the intrinsic Griffith-flaw distribution to essentially a delta function.

It is for these reasons that the field-enhanced ion diffusion model has been introduced. The inclusion of a term for the electrostatic potential in the thin-film solution of Fick's second law has been shown to be consistent with the experimental results. Therefore, the effects on alkali ion migration as a consequence of the local variations in charge density that occur on the solution side of the glass/water interface play a direct role on the chemical corrosion mechanism. Thus chemistry which can modify the surface potential can alter the rate of aging of glass.

It has been found that the chemistry which has been used to modify the corrosion behavior of glass fibers can also alter composite properties. These modifications no doubt arise from changes in the interphase region.

We report on the effects of treatments on initial fiber strengths, aging resistance, and preliminary results of composite properties (made from our treated fibers).

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 114: Symposium R – Bonding in Cementitious Composites , 1987 , 181
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kruger, A.A., in Surface and Near-Surface Chemistry of Oxide Materials, edited by Dufour, L-C. and Nowotny, J. (Elsevier Scientific Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1987), Chapter 9.Google Scholar
2. Boksay, Z., Bouquet, G. and Dobos, S., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 8, 140 (1967).Google Scholar
3. Doremus, R.H., in Treatise on Materials Science and Technoloav Vol.17, edited by Tomozawa, M. and Doremus, R.H. (Academic Press, New York, 1979), p. 41.Google Scholar
4. Douglas, R.W. and EI-Shamy, T.M., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 50, 1 (1967).Google Scholar
5. Bekishev, K., Shul'ts, M.M. and Parenov, A.I., Sov. J. Glass Phys. Chem., 4, 193 (1978).Google Scholar
6. Geffken, W., Kolloid-Z, 86, 11 (1939).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hudson, G.A. and Bacon, F.R., Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 37, 185 (1958).Google Scholar
8. Oka, Y. and Tomozawa, M., J. Noncryst. Solids, 42, 535 (1980)Google Scholar
9. Wiegel, E., Glastechn. Ber., 34, 259 (1961).Google Scholar
10. McVay, G.L. and Farnum, E.H., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 55, 275 (1972); 61, 43 (1978).Google Scholar
11. Fowkes, F.M. and Burgess, T.E., in Clean Surfaces, edited by Goldfinger, G., (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1970), pp. 351–360.Google Scholar
12. Mularie, W.M., Furth, W.F. and Westwood, A.R.C., J. Mater. Sci., 14, 2659 (1979).Google Scholar
13. Horn, J.M. Jr., and Onoda, G.Y. Jr., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 61, 523 (1978), and references therein. For a review of Alkali-Resistant Glass Fibres; A.J. Majumdarin, in Handbook of Composites, Vol, 1-Strong Fibres, edited by W. Watt and B.V. Perov, (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1985), Chapter II.Google Scholar
14. Kruger, A.A. and Mularie, W.M., in Ootical Fibers in Adverse Environments, edited by Boucher, D., (SPIE, 404, Bellingham, WA, 1984), pp. 2–8.Google Scholar
15. Kruger, A.A., Ceccaroli, B. and Harris, N.M., in Reactivity of Solids, edited by Barret, P. and Dufour, L-C., (Materials Science Monographs, 28A, Elsevier, 1985), p. 209.Google Scholar
16. Havelock, G., Measurement of Interface Shear Strength in Glass Fibre/Resin Matrix Composites, University of Surrey, B.Sc. Thesis, June, 1986.Google Scholar
17. LaCourse, W.C., in Introduction to Glass Science, edited by Pye, L.D., Stevens, H.J. and LaCourse, W.C., (Plenum Press, New York, 1976), pp. 451–512.Google Scholar
18. Hillig, W.B., in Modern Asoects of the Vitreous State, edited by Mackenzie, J.D., (Butterworths, London, 1962), pp. 152–194.Google Scholar