Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:31:13.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Solidification Rate on Fiber Distribution and Mechanical Properties of a Directionally Solidified Nickel Base-Tac Eutectic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

John L. Walter
John L. Walter*
Affiliation:
General Electric Corporate Research and DevelopmentP.O. Box 8Schenectady, NY 12301
Get access

Abstract

A nickel base-TaC eutectic alloy consisting of 53 wt % Ni, 11 W, 3 Re, 5 Co, 3 Mo, 2 Al, 21.67 Ta and 1.33 C was directionally solidified at rates from 0.32 to 3.8 cm/hr. Samples were taken from the regions of aligned TaC fibers and tested in tension at 1000°C and in stress-rupture. The fiber density increased from 1×106 fibers/cm2 at 0.32 cm/hr to 27×106 fibers/cm2 at 3.8 cm/hr. The stress-rupture life at 927°C and 275.6 MPa ranged from 4 hrs for samples solidified at 0.32 cm/hr to 4187 hrs for the sample solidified at 2.54 cm/hr at which time the test was terminated. Examination, by transmission electron microscopy, of the samples tested at 1000°C in tension, to just the beginning of fiber breakage, revealed a change in the mode of deformation of the nickel-base alloy matrix with increasing fiber density. It was also seen that the TaC fibers deformed by two mechanisms; by slip and by the formation of stacking faults.

It appears that tailoring the alloy composition to allow for higher solidification rates may be a more effective strengthener than alloying the matrix for high strength.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 12: Symposium L – In Situ Composites IV , 1981 , 85
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tiller, WA, in Liquid Metals and Solidification, ASM, Metals Park, OH (1958).Google Scholar
2. Jackson, KA and Hunt, JD, Trans. TMS-AIME, 236 (1966) 1129.Google Scholar
3. Cooksey, DJS, Munson, D, Wilkinson, MP and Hellawell, A, Phil. Mag., 10 (1962) 745.Google Scholar
4. Walter, JL and Cline, HE, Met. Trans., 1 (1970) 1221.Google Scholar
5. Bullock, E, Quested, PN and McLean, M, Conf. on In-Situ Composites-II, Ginn Custom Publishing. Lexington, MA (1979) 420.Google Scholar
6. Henry, MF, Proc. of the Conf. on In-Situ Composites, Vol. II, NMAB 308– II, (1973) 173.Google Scholar
7. Thompson, ER, George, FD and Breinan, EM, Proc. of Conf. on In-Situ Composites, Vol. II, NMAB 308–11, (1973) 71.Google Scholar
8. Walter, JL, Proc. of Conf. on In-Situ Composites-II, Ed. Jackson, MR et al. , Xerox Individualized Publishing, Lexington, MA, (1976) 273.Google Scholar
9. Walter, JL and Cline, HE, Met. Trans., 4 (1973) 1775.Google Scholar
10. Walter, JL and Cline, HE, Proc. of Conf. on In-Situ Composites, Vol. I, NMAB 308–11, (1973) 71.Google Scholar
11. Hatfield, WT, Lifshin, E and Jackson, MR, Proc. of 8thAnnual Conf. on Electron Probe Analysis, New Orleans, (1973) 82A.Google Scholar
12. Cline, HE, Walter, JL, Lifshin, E and Russell, RR, Met. Trans., 2 (1971) 189.Google Scholar
13. Jackson, KA and Hunt, JD, Trans. TMS-AIME, 236 (1966) 1129.Google Scholar
14. Bibring, H., Proc. of the Conf. on In-Situ Composites, Vol. II, NMAB 308–11, (1973) 1.Google Scholar
15. Rowcliffe, DJ and Hollox, GE, J. Materials Science, 6 (1971) 1270.Google Scholar
16. Fritscher, K. and Wirth, G., Conf. on In-Situ Composites-II, Ed. Walter, Jackson, Lemkey and Hertzberg, Xerox Individualized Publishing, Lexington, MA, (1976) 597.Google Scholar