Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:54:12.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Natural Glasses as Analogues in Projecting the Long-Term Alteration of High-Level Nuclear Waste Glasses: Part 1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

James J. Mazer
James J. Mazer*
Affiliation:
Chemical Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439.
Get access

Abstract

The common observation of glasses persisting in natural environments for long periods of time (up to tens of millions of years) provides compelling evidence that these materials can be kinetically stable in a variety of subsurface environments. This paper reviews how natural and historical synthesized glasses can be employed as natural analogues for understanding and projecting the long-term alteration of high-level nuclear waste glasses. The corrosion of basaltic glass results in many of the same alteration features found in laboratory testing of the corrosion of high-level radioactive waste glasses. Evidence has also been found indicating similarities in the rate controlling processes, such as the effects of silica concentration on corrosion in groundwater and in laboratory leachates. Naturally altered rhyolitic glasses and tektites provide additional evidence that can be used to constrain estimates of long-term waste glass alteration. When reacted under conditions where water is plentiful, the corrosion for these glasses is dominated by network hydrolysis, while the corrosion is dominated by molecular water diffusion and secondary mineral formation under conditions where water contact is intermittent or where water is relatively scarce. Synthesized glasses that have been naturally altered result in alkali-depleted alteration features that are similar to those found for natural glasses and for nuclear waste glasses. The characteristics of these alteration features appear to be dependent on the alteration conditions which affect the dominant reaction processes during weathering. In all cases, care must be taken to ensure that the information being provided by natural analogues is related to nuclear waste glass corrosion in a clear and meaningful way.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 333: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVII , 1993 , 159
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Ewing, R.C., Sci. Basis for Nucl. Waste Mgmt.. McCarthy, G.J., (Ed.), Plenum Press, New York, 57 (1978).Google Scholar
2 Petit, J.-C., Appl. Geochem. Suppl Issue 1, 9 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Chapman, N.A., McKinley, I.G., and Smellie, J.A.T., The Potential of Natural Analogues in Assessing Systems for Deep Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste, NAGRA Technical Report NTB 84-41 (1984).Google Scholar
4 Chapman, N.A. and Smellie, J.A.T., Chem. Geol. 55, 167 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 McKenzie, W.F., Natural Glass Analogues to Alteration of Nuclear Waste Glass: A Review and Recommendations for Further Study, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCID-21871 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Pearcy, E.C. and Murphy, W.M., Geochemical Natural Analogs Literature Review, Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses Report CNWRA 90-008 (1991).Google Scholar
7 J. C. Cunnane (Ed.), High-Level Waste Borosilicate Glass: A compendium of Corrosion Characteristics. Volume II, Argonne National Laboratory Report (in press).Google Scholar
8 Vandiver, P.B., Swann, C.P., Cramer, D., Mater. Issues in Art and Arch. II, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 185, 609 (1991).Google Scholar
9 Vandiver, P.B., Corrosion of Glass. Ceramics and Superconductors, Clark, D.E. and Zoitos, B.K. (Eds.), Noyes Press, Park Ridge NJ, 393 (1992).Google Scholar
10 Kingery, W.D. and Vandiver, P.B., Applications of Science in Examination of Works of Art, England, P.A. and Van Zelst, L. (Eds.), Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 100 (1985).Google Scholar
11 Ewing, R.C. and Jercinovic, M.J., Sci. Basis for Nucl. Waste Mgmt. X. Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (Eds.), Mat. Res. Soc., Pittsburgh, 67, (1987).Google Scholar
12 Byers, C.B., Jercinovic, M.J., and Ewing, R.C., A Study of Natural Glass Analogues as Applied to Alterations of Nuclear Waste Glass, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-86-46 (1987).Google Scholar
13 Allen, C., Sci. Basis for Nucl. Waste Mgmt. Lutze, V.W. (Ed.), Mat. Res. Soc, Pittsburgh, 37 (1982).Google Scholar
14 Keith, T.E. and Staples, L.W., Clay and Clay Min. 33, 135 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Crovisier, J.L., Honnorez, J., Fritz, B. and Petit, J.-C., Appl. Geochem. Suppl. Issue 1, 55 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Crovisier, J.L., Honnorez, J., and Eberhart, J.P., Geochim. Cosmo. Acta 51, 2977 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Gislason, S.R. and Eugster, H.P., Geochim. Cosmo. Acta 51, 2827 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Lutze, W., Malow, G., Ewing, R.C., Jercinovic, M.J. and Keil, K., Nature 314, 252 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Jercinovic, M.J. and Ewing, R.C., Basaltic Glasses from Iceland and Deep Sea: Natural Analogues to Borosilicate Nuclear Waste-Form Glass, Japanese Swiss Swedish Project Technical Report JSS-88-01 (1987).Google Scholar
20 Malow, G., Lutze, W., and Ewing, R.C., J. Non-Cryst. Sol., 67. 305 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Karkhanis, S.N., Bancroft, G.M., Fyfe, W.S. and Brown, J.D., Nature 284, 435 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Friedman, I., and Long, W., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 67, 127 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 White, A.F. and Claassen, H.C., Chem. Geol. 28, 91 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Dickin, A.P., Nature 294, 342 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Mazer, J.J., Bates, J.K., Bradley, C.R. and Stevenson, C.M., J. Nucl. Mater 190, 277 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Magonthier, M.-C., Petit, J.-C., and Dran, J.-C., Appl. Geochem Suppl Issue 1, 83 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Abrajano, T.A., Bates, J.K., and Mazer, J.J., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 108, 269 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Mazer, J.J., Bates, J.K., Stevenson, C.M. and Bradley, C.R., Sci. Basis for Nucl. Waste Mgmt. XV, Sombret, C.. (Ed.), Mat. Res. Soc, Pittsburgh, 513 (1992).Google Scholar
29 Dran, J.-C., Delia Mea, G., Paccagnella, A., Petit, J.-C., and Trotignon, L., Phys. Chem Glasses 29 (6). 249 (1988).Google Scholar
30 Petit, J.-C., Delia Mea, G., and Paccagnella, A., Chem. Geol. 78, 219 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 Barkatt, Aa., Boulos, M.S., Barkatt, Al., Sousanpour, W., Boroomand, M.A., Macedo, P.B., and O’Keefe, J.A., Geochim. et Cosmo. Acta 48, 361 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 LaMarche, P., Rauch, F., and Lanford, W.A., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 67, 361 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Rauch, F., Ericson, J.E., Wagner, W., Grimm-Leimsner, C., Livi, R.P., Shi, C. and Tombrello, T.A., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 144, 224 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34 Mazer, J.J., Bates, J.K., Bradley, J.P., Bradley, C.R., and Stevenson, C.M., Nature 357, 573 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Sigurdsson, H., D’hondt, S., Arthur, M.A., Bralower, T.J., Zachos, J.C.,Van Fossen, M., and, Channell, J.E.T., Nature 349, 482 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Izett, G., Dalrymple, G. and Snee, L., Science 252, 1539 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37 Vandiver, P.B., this volume (1994).Google Scholar