Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:20:57.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Nanoscale Confinement of Adhesion Promoting Molecules on the Adhesion and Resistance to Moisture Attack at the Polymer/Silicon Nitride Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Bree M. Sharratt  and
Reinhold H. Dauskardt
Bree M. Sharratt
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stanford University, Aeronautics and Astronautics, 416 Escondido Mall, Bldg 550, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305-2205, United States, 650-725-2634
Reinhold H. Dauskardt
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stanford University, Materials Science and Engineering, 416 Escondido Mall, Bldg 550, Stanford, CA, 94305-2205, United States
Get access

Abstract

The interface between a highly-crosslinked polymer film and a thin silicon nitride layer can be regulated using adhesion promoting molecules. This work compares the effects of both indirect polymer/inorganic interface chemistry modification by blending organosilane adhesion promoting molecules into the polymer layer, and direct modification by confining the organosilane molecules to the substrate surface. Of particular interest are the effects of these modifications on the occurrence of an anomalous subcritical debonding phenomenon previously observed for the unmodified interface. While significantly different adhesion values were measured, the influence of the blended organosilanes was limited to moderating moisture diffusion through the polymer layer, which correllates with moderated near-threshold growth rates. Conversely, nanoscale confinement of the adhesion promoting molecules did not result in expected universal increases in adhesion energy but did inhibit anomalous near-threshold behavior.

Keywords

adhesionfracturepolymer
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 924: Symposium Z – Mechanics of Nanoscale Materials and Devices , 2006 , 0924-Z08-18
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ishida, H., Polym. Composite 5, 101 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Plueddemann, E.P., Silane Coupling Agents, 2nd ed. (Plenum Press, New York, 1991).Google Scholar
3. Jenkins, M.L., Dauskardt, R.H., Bravman, J.C., J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 18, 1497 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Dodiuk, H., Kenig, S., Liran, I, J. Adhesion 39, 123 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Sautrot, M., Abel, M.L., Watts, J.F., Powell, J., J. Adhesion 81, 163 (2005).Google Scholar
6. Ohashi, K.L, Yerby, S.A., Dauskardt, R.H., J. Biomed. Res. 54, 419 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Hohlfelder, R.J., Maidenberg, D.A., Dauskardt, R.H., Wei, Y., Hutchinson, J.W., J. Mater. Res. 16, 243 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Snodgrass, J.M., Pantelidis, D., Jenkins, M.L., Bravman, J.C., Dauskardt, R.H., Acta Mater. 50, 2395 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Sharratt, B.M., Wang, L.C., Dauskardt, R.H., J. Mater. Res. 2006. To be submitted.Google Scholar
10. Kanninen, M.F., Int. J. Fract. 9, 83 (1973).Google Scholar
11. Evans, A.G., Int. J. Fract. 9, 267 (1973).Google Scholar
12.ASTM Standard D638-03. 2005 ASTM Annual Book of Standards, vol. 8.01 (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2005) p. 50.Google Scholar
13. Liechti, K.M., Schnapp, S.T., Swadener, J.G., Int. J. Fract. 86, 361 (1997).Google Scholar