Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:25:15.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Carbon and Vacancies in Determining the Hardness of FeAl Intermetallic in the Quenched and the Aged States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

C. García-Oca
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Metallurgy, CENIM, CSIC, Avenida Gregorio del Amo 8, 28040 Madrid, SPAIN;
D.G. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Metallurgy, CENIM, CSIC, Avenida Gregorio del Amo 8, 28040 Madrid, SPAIN;
M.A. Muñoz-Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Metallurgy, CENIM, CSIC, Avenida Gregorio del Amo 8, 28040 Madrid, SPAIN;
S.C. Deevi
Affiliation:
Chrysalis Technologies, Richmond, Virginia, USA
Get access

Abstract

The role of quenched-in vacancies in FeAl intermetallics on producing considerable hardening is well known, as is the softening on annealing as vacancies are annihilated. The present study examines quench hardening and anneal softening by quenched-in vacancies and interstitial carbon solute in Fe-40Al-C. Interstitial carbon is seen to be a more potent hardening agent than the vacancy, while the co-annihilation of vacancies and carbon atoms from solution during annealing leads to dislocation loop debris, and equiaxed or plate-like carbide precipitation, according to the annealing conditions. The processes occurring have been followed by detailed TEM studies, and are discussed in terms of the relative solubilities and diffusion rates of vacancies and carbon. The relevance of such interstitial solute hardening to the behaviour of other FeAl intermetallics is also briefly considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1: Chang, Y.A., Pike, L.M., Liu, C.T., Bilbrey, A.R. and Stone, D.S., Intermetallics 1, 107 (1993).Google Scholar
2: Weber, D., Meurin, M., Paris, D., Fourdeux, A. and Lesbats, P., J. Phys. 38, 332 (1977).Google Scholar
3: Morris, M.A., George, O. and Morris, D.G., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A258, 99 (1998).Google Scholar
4: Schneibel, J.H., Munroe, P.R. and Pike, L.M., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 460, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1997, p. 379.Google Scholar
5: Kong, C.H. and Munroe, P.R., Scripta Met. et Mater. 30, 1079 (1994).Google Scholar
6: Yoshimi, K., Hanada, S., Onuma, T. and Yoo, M.H., Phil. Mag. A73, 443 (1996).Google Scholar
7: Pang, L. and Kumar, K.S., Acta Mater. 46, 4017 (1998).Google Scholar
8: Hajaligol, M.R., Deevi, S.C., Sikka, V.K. and Scorey, C.R., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A258, 249 (1998).Google Scholar
9: Deevi, S.C. and Swindeman, R.W., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A258, 203 (1998).10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00935-6Google Scholar
10: Deevi, S.C., Morris, D.G. and Sikka, V.K., Proc. ASM Conf. on Structural and Functional Intermetallics, Vancouver, July 16–20, 2000.Google Scholar
11: Palm, M. and Inden, G., Intermetallics 3, 443 (1995).Google Scholar
12: Takaki, S., Fuss, J., Kugler, H., Dedek, U. and Schultz, H., Rad. Effects. 79, 87 (1983).Google Scholar
13: Smithells Metal Reference Book, Eds. Brandes, E.A. and Brook, G.B., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 7th Edition (1992).Google Scholar