Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:32:48.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rock Varnish Cation-Ratios May not be a Reliable Method for Dating Lithic Artifacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Paul Bierman  and
Karen Harry
Paul Bierman
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
Karen Harry
Affiliation:
Statistical Research, Inc., 2500 N. Pantano Road, Tucson, ZA 85751
Get access

Abstract

Previous research suggested that the chemical composition of rock varnish, a micrometer thick Si/AI/Mn/Fe coating, changed predictably through time and so could be used as a chronometer. In particular, the cation ratio, (Ca+K)/Ti, was posited to decrease as the varnish aged. However, many earlier varnish studies were not well documented and were based on chemical analyses now shown to be inaccurate. This paper describes a test and the first direct comparison between two different analytic methods used previously to “cation-ratio date” archeologic and geologic materials. It provides methodology sufficiently detailed for replication of analytical and sampling techniques.

Our analyses of rock varnish from a prehistoric chert quarry in California show that the two principal methods used to “cation-ratio date” rock varnish generate consistently different elemental abundances and are therefore not comparable. Neither analytic method produced a significant time-dependent trend in varnish chemistry, suggesting rock varnish cation ratios are not a reproducible and thus probably not a reliable way to date lithic artifacts.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 267: Symposium J – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology III , 1992 , 165
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

1. Staley, J. T., Adams, J. B. and Palmer, F. E., Soil Biochemistry, 7, 173 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Harrington, C. D. and Whitney, J. W., Geology, 15, 967 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Dorn, R. I., Physical Geography, 13, 559 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Dorn, R. I., Quaternary Research, 20, 49 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Dorn, R. I. and Krinsley, D. H., Geology, 19, 1077 (1991).2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Reneau, S. L. and Raymond, R., Geology, 19, 37 (1991).Google Scholar
7 Harrington, C. D., Krier, D. J., Raymond, R. and Reneau, S. L., ScanningMicroscopy, 5, 55 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Bierman, P. and Gillespie, A., Geology, 19 196 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Bierman, P. and Gillespie, A., Geology, 19, 641 (1991).2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Wells, S. and McFadden, L., Geology, 15, 1178 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Lanteigne, M., Rock Art Research, 6, 145 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Lanteigne, M., Rock Art Research, 8, 127 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Pineda, C. A., Peisach, M. and Jacobson, L., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, B35, 463 (1988).Google Scholar
14. Reneau, S. L., Hagan, R. C., Harrington, C. P. and Raymond, R., ScanningMicroscopy, 5, 47 (1991).Google Scholar
15. McFadden, L. D., Wells, S. G. and Jercinovich, M. J., Geology, 15, 504 (1987).Google Scholar
16. Wells, S. G., McFadden, L. D. and Olinger, C. T., Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 23, A207 (1991).Google Scholar
17. Dorn, R. I. and 11 others, Science, 231, 830 (1986).Google Scholar
18. Bierman, P. and Kuehner, S., Chemical Geology, 95, 283 (1992).Google Scholar
19. Dethier, D. P., Harrington, C. D. and Aldrich, M. J., Geological Society of AmericaBulletin, 100, 928 (1988).Google Scholar
20. Harrington, C. D., Reneau, S. L., Raymond, R., and Krier, D. J., EOS, 71, 1341 (1990).Google Scholar
21. Raymond, R. J., Reneau, S. L. and Harrington, C. D., Scanning Microscopy, 5, 37 (1991).Google Scholar
22. Potter, R. M. and Rossman, G. R., Chemical Geology, 25, 79 (1979).Google Scholar