Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:19:42.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rheological Behaviour and Model of Metal - Polymer - Ceramic Composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Maksim V. Kireitseu
Maksim V. Kireitseu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics and Tribology, Institute of Mechanics and Machine Reliability (INDMASH), National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Lesnoe 19–62, Minsk 223052, Belarus, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In the present paper rheological behaviour of composite coating consisting of Aluminum Oxide -Polymer – Chrome Carbide was examined by using rheological models for principal Hertzian contact of a sphere and a plate. The crystallography and morphologic texture was characterized and the fracture resistance was measured using fracture-mechanics. A rheological model of the composite coating has been proposed and confirmed by in situ experiments. Several requirements to rheological models were formulated regarding an adequate strain-deformation state of the composite coating. Load rating revealed ultimate strain-deformation rates. Analysis of the models and experimental results revealed better understanding of composite failure and degradation mechanics.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 740: Symposium I – Nanomaterials for Structural Applications , 2002 , I7.12
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sakai M. and Bradt, R.C. Int. Met. Rev. 38: 53–78, (1993).Google Scholar
2. Lawn, B.R. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81 (9): 2394–2404, (1998).Google Scholar
3. Markov, G.A. Vestník of Moscow St. Univ., Mashinostroenie, 1. 32–45, (1992).Google Scholar
4. Rudnitski, V.A., Kren, A.P. and Shilko, S.V. Wear, Vol. 22, 5, 502–508, (2001).Google Scholar
5. Rheology, Reiner M.. Moscow., Nauka, (1965).Google Scholar
6. Shulman, Z.P., Rheophysics. - Nauka, Minsk, (1977).Google Scholar
7. Shulman, Z.P. and Rheodynamic, Smolski B.S. of non-linear viscous –plastic materials. –Minsk, (1970).Google Scholar
8. Basenuk, V., Kireytsev, M. and Fedaravichus, A. in Proc. of the Symposium of Materials & Construction Failure. 23–25 May 2001 Augustov, Poland, 12, (2001).Google Scholar
9. Kireitseu, M., and Yerakhavets, S. in Proc. of International conference on metallurgical layers and thin films - ICMCTF 2002. Ed. DrSartwell, B.. - San Diego, California, USA, 156–165, (2002).Google Scholar
10. Bezuhov, N.P. Fundamentals of elasticity, plasticity and flow theories. - Moscow: Vishaya shkola, (1968).Google Scholar
11. Golberg, D.I. Mechanical behavior of polymers. Moscow, Chemistry, (1970).Google Scholar
12. Gul, V.E. Structure and strength of polymers. Moscow., Nauka, (1971).Google Scholar
13. Frank, C. and Lawn, B. R., in Proc. R. Sac. London, A299. 291–306, (1967).Google Scholar
14. Lawn, B. R. J. Appl. Phys., 39, 4828–4836, (1968).Google Scholar
15. Lawn, B. R. Fracture of Brittle Solids. - Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge, U.K, (1993).Google Scholar
16. Lawn, B. R‥ J. Am. Ceram. Soc, Vol. 81, 9, 394–404, (1998).Google Scholar
17. Pharr, G.M., Harding, D.S., Oliver, W.C., in: Nastasi, M. et al, (Ed.): Mechanical Properties and Deformation Behaviour of Materials Having Ultra-Fine Microstractures. - Kluwer, Netherlands, 449–461, (1993).Google Scholar
18. Collins, J. Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design. 2nd ed., John Wiley&Sons, NY, (1993).Google Scholar
19. Kireitseu, M‥ Journal of Paniculate Science & Technology (PS&T), Vol. 20 (3), 1–15, (2003).Google Scholar
20. Kireitseu, M‥ Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics (JEPTER), Vol. 76 (1), 8–18,(2003).Google Scholar