Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:40:18.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Replication of Glazed Quartzite from Kerma, Capital of Ancient Kush (Sudan)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Lisa Ellis
Affiliation:
[email protected], Art Gallery of Ontario, Conservation, 317 Dundas Street West, Toronto, M5T 1G4, Canada, 416 979-6660, x223
Richard Newman
Affiliation:
[email protected], Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Scientific Research, 465 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
Michael Barsanti
Affiliation:
[email protected], School of the Museum of Fine Arts, Ceramics, 230 The Fenway, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
Get access

Abstract

Glazes found on ancient Nubian quartzite sculpture were characterized in a previous study by scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS). Now in the collection of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, these objects were excavated in the early 20th century by the joint Harvard University-Boston Museum of Fine Arts Expedition, in ancient Kerma, the capital of ancient Kush. The project presented here attempts to recreate the ancient technology used to glaze quartzite with compositions determined in the previous study. Raw and fritted experimental glazes were prepared, as well as an alkali paste mixed with a copper colorant. All of the samples were fired in modern kilns. After firing, samples of the glazes and their quartzite substrates were examined with SEM/EDS.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Reisner, George A., Excavations at Kerma, Vol. VI, (Kraus Reprint Co., Millwood, N.Y., 1975) pp. 4950, 153.Google Scholar
2. Lucas, A., Ancient Egyptian Materials and Industries, 4th Ed., revised and enlarged by Harris, J. R.. (1964) pp. 172–4.Google Scholar
3. Beck, Horace C., Ancient Egypt and the East: British School of Archaeology in Egypt, Notes on Glazed Stones, Part II.-Glazed Quartz (June 1935) p. 23.Google Scholar
4.Beck, Ibid., 1935, p. 21.Google Scholar
5.Ellis and Newman (MRS 2004).Google Scholar
6.After firing, experimental glazed quartzite pebbles were sampled in one or more places, removing glaze and substrate where possible. Samples were mounted in Buehler Epothin epoxy resin and prepared as cross sections, which were coated with carbon for analysis. These were examined in a JEOL JSM-6460 LV scanning electron microscope with an Oxford Instruments ‘INCA x-sight’ energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEM/EDS) at 20 KeV. A variety of synthetic glass and pure element standards were used; matrix corrections were carried out using the XPP procedure. Two small glazed stone fragments were placed directly in the SEM in low-vacuum mode (chamber pressure 35 pascals). All samples were observed using the JEOL back-scattered electron (BSE) detector in ‘shadow’ mode, which combines the traditional BSE image with some topographical information.Google Scholar
7.HyperGlaze: Ceramics Software for Artists. Version 10.0.1. ©1989-2005 Richard Burket 6354 Lorca Dr, San Diego, CA 92115-5509. [email protected] http//members.aol.com/hyperglaze Portions ©2000-2004 Runtime Revolution Limited. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.Google Scholar
8.Cone refers to the temperature reached in a kiln as gauged by the reaction of pyrometric cones manufactured by Orton, (see www.ortonceramics.com) when heated at 150°C/hour.Google Scholar
9.Recipe for natron is available on the Royal Ontario Museum's website, at http://www.rom.on.ca/schools/egypt/learn/mummyb.php.Google Scholar
10.See the following for maximum contemporaneous firing temperatures: Vandiver, Pamela B., Swann, C. & Crammer, D., “A review of mid-second millennium BC Egyptian glass technology at Tell el-Amarna,” Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology II, (MRS 1991), pp. 609–16; Paul Nicholson & Julian Henderson, Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology, Ed. I. Shaw, (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2000) p. 200.Google Scholar