Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:37:29.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reliability Improvement of Aluminum Wirebonds in High‐Power Igbt Modules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Gene Thome
Affiliation:
Product Analysis Laboratory, CPSTG, Motorola, Phoenix, AZ
Timothy Scott Savage
Affiliation:
Product Analysis Laboratory, CPSTG, Motorola, Phoenix, AZ
Get access

Abstract

Wirebonding is the weakest area of device packaging of power IGBT modules. Accelerated thermal fatigue testing causes cracks to form and propagate in the aluminum wirebond at the foot area. This study examined the relationship of the wirebond reliability and the aluminum wire grain structure, which can be affected by post‐wirebond heat treatment. A series of wirebonded IGBTs were annealed at a temperature range from 280°C to 400°C for up to 60 minutes. Wirebond shear strengths versus temperature cycles were examined. Cross‐sectional SEM was used to examine both aluminum grain size development by annealing and crack initiation and propagation in the wirebonds after temperature cycling. It was found that aluminum grain size was increased by post‐wirebond annealing. With temperature cycling, the wirebond shear strengths of the as‐wirebonded samples decrease rapidly, and lifted wirebonds were present after 1500 temperature cycles. The lifted wirebonds typically break within the aluminum wire near the wire/metallization interface. The shear strength of the wirebonds with post‐wirebond annealing showed no significant change even after 5000 temperature cycles, and there were no signs of significant deterioration of the wirebonds either. The wirebond crack initiation and growth rates were depressed substantially by larger aluminum grains. Annealing of the aluminum wire after wirebonding provided increased aluminum grain size resulting in improved reliability of the wirebonds of high power modules.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Petterteig, A. and Rogne, T., Proc. of EPE‐MADEP Conf., 203 (1991).Google Scholar
2 Lorenz, L., Tietge, H., and Feldvoss, M., Proc. 2nd Int. Technology ‐ Transfer Congress, 103 (1990).Google Scholar
3 Wu, W., Held, M., Jacob, P., and Scacco, P., Proc. Int. Symp. on Power Semiconductor Device & les., 10.4 (1995).Google Scholar
4 Sumi, S., Ohga, K., and Shirai, K., Int. Symp. for Testing and Failure Analysis, 309 (1989).Google Scholar
5 Lambilly, H. and Keser, H., IEEE Trans. CHMT. 16, 412, (1993).Google Scholar