Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:26:20.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Release of U, REE and Th From Palmottu Granite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Mira K. Markovaara-Koivisto
Affiliation:
Helsinki University of Technology, PO Box 6200, FIN-02015 TKK, Finland
Nuria Marcos
Affiliation:
Saanio & Riekkola Oy, Laulukuja 4, FIN-00420 HELSINKI, Finland
David Read
Affiliation:
Enterpris, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 227, Reading, RG6 6AB, UK
Antero Lindberg
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Finland, Betonimiehenkuja 4, FIN-02150 ESPOO, Finland
Marja SiitariKauppi
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, PO Box 55, FIN-00014 HELSINKI UNIVERSITY, Finland
Kirsti P. Loukola-Ruskeeniemi
Affiliation:
Helsinki University of Technology, PO Box 6200, FIN-02015 TKK, Finland
Get access

Abstract

Interpretation of trace metal mobility in geological environments is often hampered by conflicting data from alternative experimental protocols and the lack of detailed mineralogical characterization of the host medium. To illustrate this issue, the release of uranium, thorium and the rare earth elements (REE) was investigated in polished rock slab samples from the U-Th deposit at the Palmottu Natural Analogue study site (SW Finland) by means of leaching experiments. The samples were sequentially leached with artificial groundwater of moderately high carbonate content at pH8, and nitric acid solutions at pH5 and pH3. The mineralogy and composition of the U, Th and REE mineral phases was studied using SEM-WDS and EDAX methods before and after each leaching step. In parallel, leaching was carried out on crushed material of the same samples and the leachates analysed by ICP-MS.

The most notable U minerals are uraninite, uranophane and two secondary U-Pb phases. Thorium occurs predominantly in monazite and at lower concentrations in uraninite. Accessory thorite is also present, which together with monazite contains most of the REE. Differential leaching of the elements was noted across all phases on the timescale of the experiments. Uraninite is partly dissolved at pH3. The main secondary uranium phase, uranophane, was stable in moderately acidic solution, but easily dissolved in the artificial groundwater and at pH3. Some release of REE was observed although the main REE-bearing phase, monazite, showed no evidence of degradation.

This study provides insights in the preferential release of radionuclides in granitic bedrock. An understanding of these processes is essential when assessing the safety of a spent fuel repository. Once released from the primary waste form U is expected to precipitate as secondary phases within micro fractures, as observed at Palmottu and numerous other deposits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Read, D., Black, S., Buckby, T., Hellmuth, K-H., Marcos, N. and Siitari-Kauppi, M., 2007. Secondary uranium mineralization in southern Finland and its relationship to recent glacial events. Global and Planetary Change, doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.02.006.Google Scholar
2 Blomqvist, R., Ruskeeniemi, T., Kaija, J., Ahonen, L., Paananen, M., Smellie, J., Grundfelt, B., Pedersen, K., Bruno, J., Villar, L. Pérez del, Cera, E., Rasilainen, K., Pitkänen, P., Suksi, J., Casanova, J., Read, D. and Frape, S., 2000. The Palmottu Analogue Project – Phase II: Transport of radionuclides in a natural flow system at Palmottu. CEC Report EUR 19611.Google Scholar
3 Löfvendahl, R. and Holm, E., 1981. Radioactive disequilibria and apparent ages of secondary uranium minerals from Sweden. Lithos 14: 182201.Google Scholar
4 Read, D., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Kelokaski, M., Black, S., Buckby, T., Marcos, N., Kaija, J. and Hellmuth, KH., 2004. Natural geochemical fluxes in Finland as indicators of nuclear repository safety. Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Rock Engineering, Research Report 34, Espoo. 58 p.Google Scholar
5 Ruskeeniemi, T., Lindberg, A., Villar, L. Pérez del, Blomqvist, R., Suksi, J., Blyth, A. and Cera, E., 2002. Uranium mineralogy with implications from mobilisation of uranium at Palmottu. In. “Proc. 8thCEC Natural Analogue Working Group Meeting”, Strasbourg. CEC Report EUR 19118.Google Scholar
6 Allard, B., Karlsson, F. and Neretnieks, I., 1991. SKB Technical Report 91-50.Google Scholar