Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:43:09.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships Between the Structure and the Surface Activity of Nano-Sized Alumina in Acid Catalysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

D. Coster ,
V. Gruver ,
A. Blumenfeld  and
J. J. Fripiat
D. Coster
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201
V. Gruver
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201
A. Blumenfeld
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201
J. J. Fripiat
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Laboratory for Surface Studies
Get access

Abstract

As shown in another communication to Symposium V, nano-sized aluminas enriched in pentacoordinated aluminum (Alv) are obtained through the limited hydrolysis of aluminum alkoxides. Here the surface properties of these aluminas are investigated from the catalytic point of view. The goal is to obtain geometrical information on the Lewis acid sites. 1H→27A1 (cross-polarization) high resolution MAS NMR, using chemisorbed NH3 which acts as a XH spin reservoir, allows the direct observation of surface Al involved in the catalytic site. The polarization transfer from these protons to surface Al is remarkably efficient because of the relatively short A1:N-H distance. It is observed that the main Lewis acid sites are located on distorted tetrahedral aluminum and pentacoordinated Al. These results are compared to low temperature infrared data of adsorbed CO.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 346: Symposium N – Better Ceramics Through Chemistry VI , 1994 , 961
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Ballinger, T.H. and Yates, J.T. Jr., Langmuir 7, 3041 (1991).Google Scholar
2 Knozinger, H. and Ratnasamy, P., Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 17, 31 (1978).Google Scholar
3 Morris, H.D. and Ellis, P.D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 6045 (1989). B.A. Huggins and P.D. Ellis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 2098 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Gruver, V. and Fripiat, J.J., submitted to J. Phys. Chem..Google Scholar
5 Coster, D. and Fripiat, JJ., Chem. of Mater. 5, 1204 (1993).Google Scholar
6 Coster, D.J., Blumenfeld, A. and Fripiat, JJ., submitted to J. Phys. Chem..Google Scholar
7 Stein, A., Wehrle, B. and Jansen, M., Zeolites, 13, 291 (1993).Google Scholar
8 Auroux, A., Institut de Recherche sur le Catalyse, Lyon, France. Personal communication.Google Scholar
9 Spiewak, B.E., Handy, B.E., Sharma, S.B. and Dumesic, J.A., Catal. Lett., 23, 207 (1994).Google Scholar