Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:57:37.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Relationship between Deposition Conditions, Microstructure and Properties of Re-Tm Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J-W. Lee
Affiliation:
Magnetic Materials Research Group, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
S-C. N. Cheng
Affiliation:
Magnetic Materials Research Group, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
M. H. Kryder
Affiliation:
Magnetic Materials Research Group, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
D. E. Laughlin
Affiliation:
Magnetic Materials Research Group, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
Get access

Abstract

Both TbCo and TbFe thin films were dc-magnetron sputtered onto carbon-coated Cu grids as well as glass substrates from a three inch mosaic target using a variety of power levels and argon pressures (PAr). The perpendicular anisotropy (Ku) displays a maximum in the range of 2.5 to 11.5 mTorr of PAr and decreased with further increases in PAr. Films deposited at low PAr (< 11.5 mTorr) exhibit a smooth and featureless microstructure. Lorentz electron microscopy images reveal the magnetic domains in them as black and white dots which are characteristic of perpendicular magnetization. On the other hand, films deposited at higher PAr (> 11.5 mTorr) exhibit a rougher surface, a high density of microvoids and in-plane magnetic domains with ripple.

A similar study was also made of the effects of deposition power on the microstructure and domains at PAr = 5 mTorr. The Ku was found to decrease with increasing power. The microstructure at 30,40 and 50 watts did not reveal any significant difference except that there was a slight increase in surface roughness with increasing power.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Gambino, R J., Chaudhari, P. and Cuomo, J J., AIP Conf. Proc. No. 18, 578 (1974).Google Scholar
2 Heiman, N., Onton, A., Kyser, D.F., Lee, K. and Guarniere, C.R., AIP Conf. Proc. No. 24, 573 (1973).Google Scholar
3 Meiklejohn, W.H., Luborsky, F.E. and Frischmann, P.G., IEEE Trans. Magn. Mg–23, 2272 (1987).Google Scholar
4 Leamy, H J. and Dirks, A.G., J. Appl. Phys. 50, 2871 (1979).Google Scholar
5 Takagi, H., Tsunashima, S. and Uchiyama, S., J. Appl. Phys. 50, 1642 (1979).Google Scholar
6 Lee, J.-W., Shieh, H.-P.D., Kryder, M.H. and Laughlin, D.E., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 3624 (1988).Google Scholar
7 Shieh, H.-P.D., Kryder, M.H. and Lee, J.-W., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG–24, 2446 (1988).Google Scholar
8 Cheng, S-C.N., Kryder, M.H. and Mathur, M.C.A., Paper HQ-03, InterMag 89, Washington, DC, March, 1989, to be published in IEEE Trans. Mag. Google Scholar
9 Thornton, J.A., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 11. 666 (1974).Google Scholar