Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:21:42.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-Time Monitoring Of GaAs(100) Etching By Surface Photoabsorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Joseph Eng Jr.
Affiliation:
Columbia Radiation Laboratory and Departments of Chemistry
Hongbin Fang
Affiliation:
Columbia Radiation Laboratory and Departments of Chemistry
Chaochin Su
Affiliation:
Columbia Radiation Laboratory and Departments of Chemistry
Sujata Vemuri
Affiliation:
Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027
Irving P. Herman
Affiliation:
Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027
Brian E. Bent
Affiliation:
Columbia Radiation Laboratory and Departments of Chemistry
Get access

Abstract

Surface photoabsorption (SPA) has been applied to monitor, in real time, the surface of GaAs(100) during chemical dry etching by a molecular beam of HCl. Changes in the HCl flux to the surface at a constant temperature (840 K) have been used to induce changes in the Ga:As ratio on the surface. These changes in surface stoichiometry have been detected in situ via SPA measurements of the transient fractional change in the reflectance of p-polarized, 488 nm light that is incident onto the surface near the pseudo-Brewster angle. On the basis of results from prior applications of SPA to the study the atomic layer deposition of GaAs, the changes in the SPA signal as a function of the etching parameters can be correlated with changes in the relative surface densities of Ga and As. The findings are confirmed by independent determinations of the changes in surface stoichiometry made by measuring the time-integrated difference in the fluxes of Ga- and As-containing etching products evolved from the surface as a function of the HC1 flux.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Herman, I. P., “Optical Dignostics for Thin Film Processing” (Academic, San Diego, 1996).Google Scholar
2. McGilp, J. F., Prog. Surf. Sci. 49, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Aspnes, D. E., Surf. Sci. 307–309, 1017 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Kobayashi, N. and Horikoshi, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29, L702 (1990); N. Kobayashi, T. Makimoto, Y. Yamauchi, and Y. Horikoshi, J. Cryst. Growth 107, 62 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Nishi, K., Usui, A., and Sakaki, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 31 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Dietz, N., Miller, A., and Bachmann, K. J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13, 153 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Meguro, T., Hamagaki, M., Modaressi, S., Hara, T., Aoyagi, Y., Ishii, M., Yamamoto, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1552 (1990)Google Scholar
8. Aoyagi, Y., Shimura, K., Kawasaki, K., Tanaka, T., Gamo, K., Namba, S., Nakamoto, I., Appl. Phys. Lett 60, 968 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Su, C., Dai, Z.-G., Sun, D.-H., Luo, W., Vernon, M., and Bent, B. E.. Surf. Sci. 312, 181 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Contour, J., Massies, J., Salètes, A., Outrequin, M., Simondet, F., Rochette, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 5, 730 (1987).Google Scholar