Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:48:17.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiation Testing of AlInAs/lnGaAs and GaAs/AlGaAs HBTs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

S. B. Witmer ,
S. Mittleman ,
D. Lehy ,
F. Ren ,
T. R. Fullowan ,
R. F. Kopf ,
C. R. Abernathy ,
S. J. Pearton ,
D. A. Humphrey  and
R. K. Montgomery
...Show all authors
S. B. Witmer
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Reading, PA 19604.
S. Mittleman
Affiliation:
Rome Laboratory, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731.
D. Lehy
Affiliation:
Rome Laboratory, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731.
F. Ren
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974.
T. R. Fullowan
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974.
R. F. Kopf
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974.
C. R. Abernathy
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974.
S. J. Pearton
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974.
D. A. Humphrey
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974.
R. K. Montgomery
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974.
P. R. Smith
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974.
J. P. Kreskovsky
Affiliation:
Scientific Research Associates, Glastonbury, CT 06033.
H. L. Grubin
Affiliation:
Scientific Research Associates, Glastonbury, CT 06033.
Get access

Abstract

The radiation hardness of small geometry (∼2 × 4 μm2), state of the art AlInAs/lnGaAs and GaAs/AlGaAs HBTs to 60Co γ-ray has been investigated up to a dose of 100 MRad. The former devices showed a small change in Ic and gain for 20 MRad, with essentially no change in IB. At 40 MRad, the gain of the devices had decreased to unity. By contrast, for GaAs/AlGaAs HBTs, the current gain actually increased up to a dose of 75 MRad. At 100 MRad, none of our devices were still operational. This was ascribed to degradation of the base-collector contact metallization (TiPtAu) and in particular to the presence of Au. Carbon-and beryllium-doped base devices showed the same response to 60Co γ-ray doses. No long transient responses in either base or collector currents were observed during irradiation of the GaAs/AlGaAs devices with 120 nsec pulses of 10 MeV electrons at rates up to 2.7 × 1010 Rad · sec−1. Results of a 2-dimensional modelling study suggest that both GaAs and InP based HBTs are relatively immune to damage by transient radiation effects up to a dose rate of 1011 Rad · sec−1, with GaAs based devices being more resistant to radiation than InP due to their shorter recombination times.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 240: Symposium E – Advanced III-V Compound Semiconductor Growth, Processing and Devices , 1991 , 523
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. See for example, Asbeck, P. M., Chang, M. C. F., Wang, C. F. and Miller, D. L. in Introduction to Semiconductor Technology ed. Wang, C. T. (Wiley-Interscience, NY, 1990), Chapter 4.Google Scholar
2. Schrantz, G. A., van Vonno, N. W., Krull, W. A., Rao, M. A., Long, S. I. and Kroemer, H., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 35 1657 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Liou, J. J., Physics Stat. Solidi a 119 337 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Salzmann, J. F., McNulty, D. J. and Kaudson, A. R., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 34 1676 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Listvan, M. A., Void, D. J. and Arch, D. K., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 34 1664 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Anderson, W. T., Simons, M., Tseng, W. F., Hert, J. A. and Bandy, S., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 34 1669 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Ren, F., Fullowan, T. R., Abernathy, C. R., Pearton, S. J., Smith, P. R., Kopf, R. F., Laskowski, E. J. and Lothian, J. R., Electron Lett. 27 1054 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Fullowan, T. R., Pearton, S. J., Kopf, R. F. and Smith, P. R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9 1445 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Goronkin, H., Maracas, G. N. and Fejes, P., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 96 417 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Kolchenko, T. I., Lomako, V. M. and Moroz, S. E., Sov. Phys. Semicond. 24 1221 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Sibille, A., Suski, J. and Gilleron, M., J. Appl. Phys. 60 595 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar