Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:21:09.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pulse Shape Study of Chemical Vapor Deposited Diamond Alpha Particle Detectors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

S. G. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, School of Electronics and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
P. J. Sellin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, School of Electronics and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
A. Lohstroh
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, School of Electronics and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
M. E. Özsan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, School of Electronics and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

We report a study of pulse shapes of a radiation detector with a sandwich structure fabricated from chemical vapor deposited (CVD) polycrystalline diamond. The pulse shapes were recorded at room temperature using 5.486 MeV alpha particles from 241Am source. Only “fast” component was observed in the electron predominated pulses, whereas both “fast” and “slow” components were obtained in the hole predominated pulses, suggesting that electron charge drift is prompt and no detrapping occurred. In contrast, hole charge drift is slower than expected and trapping-detrapping took place during hole travel process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kozlov, S.F., Konorova, E.A., Kuznetsov, Y.A., Salikov, Y.A., Redko, V.I., Grinberg, V.R., Meilman, M.L., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 24, 235 (1977).Google Scholar
2. Behnke, T., Huntemeyer, P., Oh, A., Steuerer, J., Wagner, A., Zeuner, W., Nul. Instrum. Meth. 414, 340 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Sellin, P.J., Breese, M.B.H., Knights, A.P., Alves, L.C., Sussmann, R.S., Whitehead, A.J., Applied Physics Letters 77(6), 913 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Angus, J.C., Hayman, C.C., Science 241, 913 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Manfredotti, C., Fizzotti, F., Mirri, K., Polesello, P., Vittone, E., Jaksic, M., Tadic, T., Bodganovic, I., Pochet, T., Diamond Relat. Mater. 6, 320 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Bergonzo, P., Foulon, F., Marshall, R.D., Jany, C., Brambilla, A., McKeag, R.D., Jackman, R.B. Diamond Relat. Mater. 8, 952 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Wang, S.G., Zhang, Q., Bettiol, A. A., Physics Letters A 332, 475 (2004).Google Scholar
8. Hecht, K., Z. Physik 77, 235 (1932).Google Scholar
9. Marinelli, M.M., Milani, E, Paoletti, A., Tucciarone, A., Verona-Rinati, G., Angelone, M., Pillon, M., Phys. Rev. B 64, 195205 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Souw, E-K and Meilunas, R.J., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 400 (1997) 6986.Google Scholar
11. Tromson, D., Bergonzo, P., Brambilla, A., Mer, C., Foulon, F., Amosov, V.N., Journal of Applied Physics 87, 3360 (2000).Google Scholar
12. Marinelli, M.M., Milani, E, Morgada, M.E., Pucella, G., Rodriguez, G., Tucciarone, A., Verona-Rinati, G., Applied Physics Letters 83, 3707 (2003).Google Scholar