Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:47:21.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Protein Fingerprinting Using Flat-Surface Electrophoresis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Perumal Radha Ramasamy
Affiliation:
[email protected], SUNY - Stony Brook University, Materials Science and Engineering, 317, Old Engineering Building,, SUNY - Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794 2275, United States, 631 793 0683
Raafat Elmaghrabi
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stony Brook University, Dept of Physiology & Biophysics, T6-170 Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8661, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8661, United States
Gary Halada
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stony Brook University, Materials Science and Engineering, 308 Engineering Building, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2275, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-2275, United States
Miriam Rafailovich
Affiliation:
[email protected], Stony Brook University, Materials Science and Engineering, 322 Engineering Building, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2275, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-2275, United States
Get access

Abstract

Developments in the field of proteomics are highly encouraging for medical researchers. While gel electrophoresis offers a successful means for protein recognition, it requires the use of a relatively large system and a rather long period of time. Here, a protocol is developed for electrophoresis of proteins using flat surfaces based on the principles of electrophoresis of DNA on flat surfaces. By further adapting this system, it is hoped to create a portable device for protein electrophoresis. Droplets of fluorescently tagged proteins such as albumin, casein, poly-L-lysine and their mixtures were placed on glass surfaces in an electrophoretic cell and allowed to dry. TBE buffer was added to the cell and the migration of the salt complexes was monitored using confocal microscopy. We show that different protein - salt complexes have different mobilities on a flat surface. The shape and size distributions of the protein-salt complexes and their mixtures on surfaces were also studied using atomic force microscopy and were found to be dependent upon the proteins. It is observed that the native charge of the proteins play a dominant role in the migration of the protein-salt complexes in the electrophoretic cell. From the morphology of the protein droplets it is observed that large aggregates are formed when oppositely charged proteins are mixed. Light scattering measurements and zeta potential measurements confirm the difference in the size and shape of the aggregates in solution leading to different mobilities of the protein-salt aggregates during electrophoresis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) WJ, Henzel, Watanabe, C, Stults, JT., “Protein Identification: The Origins of Peptide Mass Fingerprinting.” J. American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 14 (September 2003): 931942.Google Scholar
(2) e-proteomics.net: Information about proteomics and techniques.2000-2002. Altruis Biomedical Network. September 18, 2003 <www.e-proteomics.net>..>Google Scholar
(3) Takasshi, M, Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 31163121.Google Scholar
(4) Shen, Y, Smith, R D, Electrophoresis 2002, 23, 31063124.Google Scholar
(5) Hille, M.J Freed, A.L, Watzig, H, Electrophoresis 2001, 22, 40354052.Google Scholar
(6) Henzel, W. J and Watanabe, C. American society for Mass spectrometry 2003, 19, 9291066.Google Scholar
(7) Pernodet, N, Samuilov, V, Shin, K, Sokolov, J, MH, Rafailovich, Gersappe, D, Chu, , “DNA electrophoresis on a flat surface.” Physical Review Letters85.26 (December 2000): 56515654.Google Scholar
(8) Peters, T Jr., Adv Protein chem. 1985, 37, 161 Google Scholar
(9) Curley, Diane M., Kumosinski, Thomas F., Unruh, Joseph J., and Farrell, Harold M. JR., J Dairy Sci 81: 31543162.Google Scholar
(10) Jacobson, B.S., and Branton, D. Science, 195, 302 (1997)Google Scholar
(11) Liu, Ge et al. , The Journal of Bilogical Chemistry, 2001, 276, 13, 3437934387 Google Scholar