Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:25:39.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Properties of the surface-modified layer of plasma-oxidized poly(dimethylsiloxane)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Kristen L. Mills
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Michigan, Mechanical Engineering, 2250 G.G. Brown, 2350 Hayward, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States, (734) 763-6901
Xiaoyue Zhu
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Michigan, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
Donghee Lee
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Michigan, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
Shuichi Takayama
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Michigan, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
M. D. Thouless
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Michigan, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
Get access

Abstract

Exposure of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) to oxygen plasma creates a thin, stiff surface-modified layer that reaches a submicron depth. Due to a significant modulus mismatch between the stiff surface-modified layer and the compliant bulk PDMS the surface-modified layer forms intricate patterns of surface buckles when under compressive stress and nano-cracks when under tensile stress. It is desirable to be able to design patterns of nano-cracks, or at least to have an understanding of them. Among the properties necessary to do this are the thickness and elastic modulus of the surface-modified layer. Due to the very small length scale of the surface-modified layer, it is a significant challenge to measure these properties. In this proceedings paper, a two-step method is described for determining the thickness and elastic modulus of the surface-modified layer using the atomic force microscope (AFM). First, nanoindentation is performed from which the bending stiffness of the surface-modified layer is calculated. Second, the surface-modified layer thickness is determined by using phase imaging on the cross-section of oxidized PDMS to map the region of the relatively stiffer surface-modified layer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bowden, N., et al., App. Phys. Lett. 75, 2557 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Hillborg, H. and Gedde, U. W., IEEE T. Dielect. El. In. 6, 703 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Hillborg, H., et al., Polymer 41, 6851 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Zhu, X., Mills, K.L., et al., Nat. Mater. 4, 403 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Thouless, M. D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 2144 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Thouless, M. D., Acta Metall. Mater. 40, 1287 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Hutchinson, J. W. and Suo, Z., Adv. Appl. Mech. 29, 64 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Beuth, J. L., Int. J. Solids Struct. 29, 1657 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Huang, R., et al., Eng. Fract. Mech. 70, 2513 (2003).Google Scholar
10. Shenoy, V. B., et al., Int. J. Fract. 103, 1 (2000).Google Scholar
11. Whitesides, G. M., et al., Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 3, 335 (2001).Google Scholar
12. Stafford, C. M., et al., Nat. Mater. 3, 545 (2004).Google Scholar
13. Efimenko, K., et al., Nat. Mater. 4, 293 (2005).Google Scholar
14. Fritz, J. L. and Owen, M. J., J. Adhesion 54, 33 (1995).Google Scholar
15. Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
16. Ol'Shanskii, V. P., Prikl. Matem. Mekhan. 51, 866 (1987).Google Scholar
17. Barber, J. R., Elasticity (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999), p. 199.Google Scholar