Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:56:51.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Progress in the Search for Metallic Hydrogen: 342 GPa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Chandrabhas Narayna ,
Jon Orloff  and
Arthur L. Ruoff
Chandrabhas Narayna
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, [email protected]
Jon Orloff
Affiliation:
Institute for Plasma Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742–3511
Arthur L. Ruoff
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The experimental search for metallic hydrogen has been active for over two decades with the first claims being published in 1975, followed by several others all of which failed to pass the test of time. The present paper describes experiments in which several important changes were made in the experiment, compared to those performed previously, which enabled us to reach a pressure of 342 GPa. The path was strewn with 15 pairs of carefully chosen diamonds. At 342 GPa visible light was readily transmitted through the sample proving that it was not yet an alkali metal. The reasons why it has been so difficult to achieve the required pressure for metallization will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 499: Symposium DD – High Pressure Materials Research , 1997 , 341
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Drickamer, H.D., private communication.Google Scholar
2. Desgreniers, S., Vohra, Y.K. and Ruoff, A.L., J. Phys. Chem. 94, 1117 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Luo, H., Desgreniers, S., Vohra, Y.K. and Ruoff, A.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2998 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Reichlin, R., Blister, K.E., McMahan, A.K., Ross, M., Martin, S., Vohr, Y.K. and Ruoff, A.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 669 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Weir, S.T., Vohra, Y.K. and Ruoff, A.L., Phys. Rev. B 35, 874 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Ashcroft, N.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1748(1968).Google Scholar
7. Weir, S.T., Mitchell, A.C. and Nellis, W.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1860 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Natoli, V., Martin, R.M. and Ceperley, D.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1952 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Ashcroft, N.W., Physics World, 43 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Hemley, R.J., Mao, H.-K., Goncharov, A.F., Hanfland, M. and Struzkin, V., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1667 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Chen, N.H., Sterer, E. and Silvera, I.F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1663 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Ruoff, A.L., Xia, H. and Xia, Q., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 4342 (1992).Google Scholar
13. Ruoff, A.L., Xia, H., Luo, H. and Vohra, Y.K., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 3830 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Mao, H.K., Xu, J. and Bell, P.M., J. Geophysics Res. 91, 4673 (1986).Google Scholar
15. Ruoff, A.L., Lincoln, R.C. and Chen, Y.C., J. Phys D: Appl. Phys. 6, 1295 (1973).Google Scholar
16. Zha, C-Z., private communication.Google Scholar
17. McQueen, R.G., Marsh, S.P., Taylor, J.W., Fritz, J.N. and Carter, W.J. in High Velocity Impact Phenomena, edited by Kinslow, R., Academic Press, NY, 1970, pp. 293–417.Google Scholar
18. Hixson, R.S., private communication.Google Scholar
19. Birch, J.F., J. Geophys. Res. 83, 1257 (1978).Google Scholar
20. Ruoff, A.L. and Christensen, N.E. [in preparation].Google Scholar
21. Christensen, N.E., Ruoff, A.L. and Rodriguez, C.O., Phys. Rev. B, 52, 9121 (1993).Google Scholar
22. Vinet, P., Ferrante, J., Smith, J.R. and Rose, J.H., J. Phys. C, 19, 467 (1986).Google Scholar
23. Einarsdolter, K., Sadigh, B., Grinvall, G. and Ozolinš, V., Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 2073 (1997).Google Scholar
24. Featherston, F.H. and Neighbors, J.R., Phys. Rev. B, 130, 1324 (1963).Google Scholar
25. Anderson, M.S. and Swenson, C. A., Phys. Rev. B, 28, 5395 (1983).Google Scholar
26. Atou, T. and Badding, J.W., J. Solid State Chem., 118, 299 (1995).Google Scholar
27. Ruoff, A.L., Luo, H. and Vohra, Y.K., J. Appl. Phys., 69, 6413 (1991).Google Scholar
28. Ruoff, A.L., Luo, H., Xia, H. and Vohra, Y.K., High Pressure Research 6, 183 (1991).Google Scholar
29. Ruoff, A.L., Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 18, 435 (1973).Google Scholar
30. Chua, J.O. and Ruoff, A.L., J. Appl. Phys., 46, 4659 (1975).Google Scholar
31. Hashn, Z. and Shtrikman, S., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 10, 343 (1962).Google Scholar
32. Baublitz, M.A. Jr, Arnold, V. and Ruoff, A.L., Rev. Sci. Instrum., 52, 1616 (1981).Google Scholar
33. Hemley, R.J., Mao, H.-K., Shen, G., Badro, J., Gillet, P., Hanfland, M. and Häusermann, D., Science 276, 1242 (1997).Google Scholar
34. Ruoff, A.L., Luo, H. and Vohra, Y.K., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 6413 (1991).Google Scholar