Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:39:51.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Probabilistic Analysis of Human Intrusion in a High Level Nuclear Waste Repository in Salt Using Draft EPA Assumptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

William V. Harper
Affiliation:
Battelle Memorial Institute, Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, 505 King Avenue, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
Gilbert E. Raines
Affiliation:
Battelle Memorial Institute, Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, 505 King Avenue, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
Get access

Abstract

The Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation (ONWI) has planned performance assessments that will quantify various performance measures for the eventual licensing of a repository in salt. In addition to studying “expected” conditions, selected discrete event scenarios must be analyzed. This paper presents a probabilistic analysis of a human intrusion scenario in which boreholes may be drilled into the repository, contact nuclear waste, and release the radionuclides to the environment. A stochastic analysis using draft EPA limiting factors regarding probability of drilling and quantities of water flow is compared to the proposed EPA 10,000 year limits. The years in which boreholes penetrate the repository are probabilistically determined in each iteration of the analysis. For each borehole, the probability of contacting radioactivity is an increasing function of time. When a borehole does make contact with radioactivity, the curie release of a given nuclide is a function of solubility limits and current inventory. Prediction intervals and complementary cumulative probability distribution functions are developed for the curie release as a fraction of the EPA limits. Radionuclide releases are small fractions of the EPA limits. This study shows that there is a high expectation that the EPA requirements would be met with a repository in salt.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1984. “Working Draft No. 4- Final -40 CFR 191-4/17/84- Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983. “Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in Geologic Repositories; Technical Criteria”, 10 CFR 60, Section 60.113, Federal Register, 48 No. 120, Office of Federal Register, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
3. McNulty, E. G., Bloom, S. G., Raines, G. E., and Vafai, K., 1984. Expected Nuclear Waste Repository Near-Field Performance at Seven Potential Salt Sites, BMI/ONWI-,prepared for Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, in preparation,Google Scholar
4. Pigford, T. H., Chairman, 1983. Waste Isolation Systems Panel (WISP) Report: A Study of the Isolation System for Geologic Disposal of Radioactive Wastes, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
5. Card, T. R., and Jansen, G., 1975. Solubility of Elements in U.S. Western Desert Ground Water and Comparison with Chemical and Radiological Concentration Limits for Drinking Water, BNWL-B-378, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Battelle Memorial Institute, Richland, WA. Google Scholar
6. Langmuir, D., 1983. Solubility of Radium in the Permian Basin, Geological Society of America, Indianapolis, IN. Google Scholar