Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:32:44.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparation and characterization of UV-cured epoxy/clay nanocomposite coatings on carbon steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2016

Jenaro L. Varela Caselis ,
Marco Morales Sánchez ,
José A. Galicia Aguilar  and
Efraín Rubio Rosas
Jenaro L. Varela Caselis
Affiliation:
Centro Universitario de Vinculación y Transferencia de Tecnología/Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Prolongación de la 24 sur y Av. San Claudio, Col. San Manuel, C.U., C.P. 72570, Puebla, Puebla, México.
Marco Morales Sánchez
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ingeniería Química/Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, 18 sur y Av. San Claudio, Col. San Manuel, C.U., C.P.72570, Puebla, Puebla, México.
José A. Galicia Aguilar
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ingeniería Química/Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, 18 sur y Av. San Claudio, Col. San Manuel, C.U., C.P.72570, Puebla, Puebla, México.
Efraín Rubio Rosas
Affiliation:
Centro Universitario de Vinculación y Transferencia de Tecnología/Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Prolongación de la 24 sur y Av. San Claudio, Col. San Manuel, C.U., C.P. 72570, Puebla, Puebla, México.
Get access

Abstract

Polymer-clay nanocomposites are compounds in which nanoclay particles are distributed in a polymer matrix. Epoxy-clay nanocomposites have become a very interesting topic among researchers in the past two decades because nanoclays have a positive effect on the mechanical, thermal and especially barrier anticorrosive performance of the polymers. In this study, epoxy-montmorillonite organoclay (OMMT) nanocomposite coatings were prepared and deposited on carbon steel substrates. The coatings were prepared through in situ polymerization and by UV-curing technique. The OMMT was added to epoxy resin at loadings between 0 wt.% and 5 wt.%, the particles of OMMT were dispersed using forced agitation-sonication and deposited on carbon steel coupons. The nanocomposite coatings obtained have been characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), spectroscopy Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and evaluated their corrosion protection effect on cold rolled carbon steel coupons by performing visual analysis. The X-ray analysis showed that exfoliation occurred for the OMMT in the polymer matrix, the SEM analysis showed that OMMT was homogenous dispersed in the polymer matrix and the coatings were uniform. The FTIR analysis showed the characteristic bands of epoxy resin and OMMT in the composite. The results showed that 1 wt.% OMMT coating exhibit better anticorrosive properties than pure epoxy.

Keywords

NanoscaleCompositePolymerization
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1819: Symposium 4D – New Trends in Polymer Chemistry and Characterization , 2016 , imrc2015s4d-p048
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

MacQueen, R.C. and Granata, R.D., Prog. Org. Coat. 28, 97 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, W., Kubouchi, M., Yamamoto, S., Sembokuya, H., Tsuda, K., Polymer 43, 2953 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malshe, V.C. and Sangaj, N.S., Prog. Org. Coat. 57, 37 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deflorian, F., Fedrizzi, L., Bonora, P.L., Corrosion Sci. 38, 1697 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangermano, M., Malucelli, G., Amerio, E., Priola, A., Billi, E., Rizza, G., Prog. Org. Coat. 54, 134 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccia, S., Turcato, E.A., Maffettone, P.L., Bongiovanni, R., Prog. Org. Coat. 63, 110 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttunen-Saarivirtaa, E., Vaganovb, G.V., Yudinb, V.E., Vuorinen, J., Prog. Org. Coat. 76 757 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangerano, M., Pallaro, E., Roppolo, I., Rizza, G., J. Mater Sci. 44 165 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomic, M.D., Dunjic, B., Likic, V., Bajat, J., Rogan, J, Djonlagic, J., Prog. Org. Coat. 77 518 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gârea, S.A., Iovu, H., Voicu, G., Appl. Clay Sci. 50 469 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crivello, J.V. and Bradley, G., Photoinitiators for Free Radical Cationic and Anionic Photopolymerization, 2nd ed. (Wiley New York, 1998) p. 329.Google Scholar
Uhl, F.M., Webster, D.C., Davuluri, S.P., Wong, S.C., Eur. Polym. J. 42 2596 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar