Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:39:40.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Technical Study of Medieval Limoges Enamels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Pete Dandridge  and
Mark T. Wypyski
Pete Dandridge
Affiliation:
Objects Conservation Department, Metropolitan Museum of Art 1000 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10028, U.S.A.
Mark T. Wypyski
Affiliation:
Objects Conservation Department, Metropolitan Museum of Art 1000 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10028, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Enamels from Northern Spain, Central France, and Limoges, dating from the 10th century to the mid 13th century, were analyzed by energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry and x-ray diffractometry to determine their overall compositions, and the opacifiers and colorants used. The compositions suggest the re-use of Roman tesserae. Calcium and lead antimonates were found as the predominant opacifiers; however, tin oxide and lead-tin yellow were also found in some of the enamels, either singly or in combination with the antimonates. One of the enamels from Limoges varied from the others in that the enamels had overall compositions similar to Islamic or Venetian glasses, and contained only tin oxide as an opacifier.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 267: Symposium J – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology III , 1992 , 817
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Verita, M., Basso, R., Wypyski, M.T. and Koestler, R.J., ‘X-Ray Microanalysis of Ancient Glassy Materials: A Comparative Studyof WDS and EDS Techniques’. (Submitted for publication).Google Scholar
2. Wheeler, G.S., Frantz, J.H., and P. Dandridge. ‘The Use of Open Architecture X-Ray Diffraction In Qualitative Analysis of Materials in Art and Archaeology.’ 1992 MRS Spring Meeting,San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
3. Caley, E.R., Analyses of Ancient Glasses, 1790-1957, (Corning,New York, 1962).Google Scholar
4. Brill, R., J. Glass Studies, 12, 185–192 (1970).Google Scholar
5. Cox, G.A., Heavens, O.S., Newton, R.G., and Pollard, A.M., J. GlassStudies 21, 54–75 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Henderson, J., Archaeometry 30(1), 77-91. (1988).Google Scholar
7. , Theophilus, ‘On Divers Arts’, translated by Smith, C.S. and J. G.Hawthorne (New York, 1979), 59Google Scholar
8. Buckton, D., Trans. 3rd Canadian Conference of Medieval ArtHistorians, (University of Western Ontario, 1985) pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
9. Sayre, E.V. and Smith, R.W., Science 133, 1824–1826 (1961).Google Scholar
10. Sayre, E.V. and Smith, R.W., Archaeological Chemistry III,pp. 279-311. (1967).Google Scholar
11. Brill, R., Excavations at Jalame - Site of a Glass Factoryin Late Roman Palestine. Weinberg, G. D., editor. (University of Missouri Press, 1988).Google Scholar
12. Turner, W.E.S., J. of the Society of Glass Technology, 40, 277TG-300T (1956).Google Scholar
13. Brill, R., Glass and Glassmaking in Ancient Mesopotamia.A.L. Oppenheim, Brill, R., Barag, D., and A. von Saldern, editors. (Corning Museum of Glass, 1970). pp. 105–128.Google Scholar
14. Turner, W. and Rooksby, H., Jahrbuch des Romisch-GermanischenZentralmuseums, Mainz, 8, 1-6. (1961).Google Scholar
15. Bateson, J.D. and Hedges, R.E.M., Archaeometry 17, 177-190 (1975).Google Scholar
16. Brill, R., Proc. 8th ICG Congress. Bruxelles. pp. 47–68.(1968)Google Scholar
17. Henderson, J., Scientific Analysis in Archaeology. Edited by J.Henderson. (Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph no. 19, 1989). pp. 30–62.Google Scholar
18. Henderson, J., Oxford Journal of Archaeolgy 4(3), 267-291 (1985).Google Scholar
19. Henderson, J., Archaeometry ‘90, 285-294. (1990).Google Scholar
20. Henderson, J., Materials Issues In Art and Archaeology II,edited by Vandiver, P.B., Druzik, J. and G.S. Wheeler. (Mater.Res. Soc. Proc., 185, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991) pp. 601–607.Google Scholar
21. Freestone, I.C., J. of Glass Studies, 32, 103-107. (1990).Google Scholar
22. Lundstrom, A., Early Medieval Studies 9, 4–7, (1976).Google Scholar
23. Englander, P., Catalog of Medieval Objects - Enamels and Glass (Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 1986) pp. xix-xxvi.Google Scholar
24. Bimson, M., Annales du 8e Congres International d'Etude Historique du Verre. Londres-Liverpool. 18-25 Septembre 1979.pp. 161-164. (1981)Google Scholar
25. , Buckton, 1985, ref. 10.Google Scholar
26. Henderson, J.. Unpublished results presented at the 1991 British Museum Enamel Colloquium.Google Scholar
27. Freestone, I.. Unpublished results presented at the 1991 British Museum Enamel Colloquium.Google Scholar
28. Verita, M. and Toninato, T., Rivista della Stazione Sperimentaledel Vetro, 20(4), 169-175 (1990).Google Scholar
29. Cox, G.A. and Gillies, K.J.S., Archaeometry, 28(1), 57-68 (1986).Google Scholar
30. Foy, D., J. Glass Studies, 21, 18-71 (1985).Google Scholar