Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T01:13:36.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Results of Laboratory Studies of Repository Chemistry for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

L. H. Brush ,
D. Grbic-Galic ,
D. T. Reed ,
X. Tong ,
R. H. Vreeland  and
R. E. Westerman
L. H. Brush
Affiliation:
Disposal Room Systems Division 6345, Sandia National Laboratories, PO Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185
D. Grbic-Galic
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
D. T. Reed
Affiliation:
Chemical Technology Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439
X. Tong
Affiliation:
Wahler Associates, 1023 Corporation Way, PO Box 10023, Palo Alto, CA 94303
R. H. Vreeland
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383
R. E. Westerman
Affiliation:
Materials and Chemical Applications Department, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, PO Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

The design-basis, defense-related, transuranic (TRU) waste to be emplaced in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) could, if sufficient H2O and nutrients were present, produce as much as 1,500 moles of gas per drum of waste. Gas production could pressurize the repository to lithostatic pressure (150 atm) and perhaps higher.

Anoxic corrosion of Fe and Fe-base alloys and microbial degradation of cellulosics are the processes of greatest concern, but radiolysis of brine could also be important. The proposed backfill additives CaC03, CaO, CuSO4, KOH, and NaOH may remove or prevent the production of some of the expected gases. We describe these processes and present preliminary results of laboratory studies of anoxic corrosion and microbial activity.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 212: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV , 1990 , 893
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lappin, A. R., R., A., Hunter, R. L., Garber, D. P., and Davies, P. B., editors, Systems Analysis. Long-Term Radionuclide Transport, and Dose Assessments. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Southeastern New Mexico; March, 1989, SAND89-0462 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1989), pp. 4–7 to 4–11 and A-5 to A-9.Google Scholar
2. Boms, D. J., Sandia National Laboratories, personal communication.Google Scholar
3. Brush, L. H., Test Plan for Laboratory and Modeling Studies of Repository and Radionuclide Chemistry for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, SAND90–0266 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1990), pp. 32 to 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Brush, L. H., p. 33.Google Scholar
5. Brush, L. H., pp. 37 to 39.Google Scholar
6. Brush, L. H., pp. 40 to 43.Google Scholar
7. Molecke, M. A., A Comparison of Brines Relevant to Nuclear Waste Experimentation, SAND83–0516 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Davies, P. B., Sandia National Laboratories, personal communication.Google Scholar
9. Brush, L. H., pp. 43 to 44.Google Scholar
10. Lappin, A. R. et al., pp. 4–5 to 4–7, A-9 to A-14, A-34 to A-38, and A-53 to A-55.Google Scholar
11. Froellch, P. N., Klinkhammer, G. P., Bender, M. L., Luedtke, N. A., Heath, G. R., Cullen, D., Dauphin, P., Hammond, D., Hartman, B., and Maynard, V., “Early Oxidation of Organic Matter in Pelagic Sediments of the Eastern Equatorial Atlantic: Suboxic Diagenesis,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 43, pp. 1075–1090 (1979).Google Scholar
12. Berner, R. A., Early Diagenesis: A Theoretical Approach (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1980).Google Scholar
13. Brush, L. H., pp. 48–53.Google Scholar
14. Owen, W. F., Stuckey, D. C., Healy, J. B. Jr, Young, L. Y., and McCarty, P. L., “Bioassay for Monitoring Biochemical Methane Potential and Anaerobic Toxicity,” Water Research, 13, pp. 485–492 (1979).Google Scholar
15. Tong, X., Smith, L. H., and McCarty, P. L., “Methane Fermentation of Lignocellulosic Materials,” submitted to Biomass.Google Scholar
16. Brush, L. H.. pp. 54–62.Google Scholar
17. Molecke, M. A., Gas Generation from Transuranic Waste Degradation: Data Summary and Interpretation, SAND79–1245 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1979).Google Scholar
18. Lappin, A. R. et al., pp. 4–5 to 4–11.Google Scholar
19. Molecke, M. A., pp. 8 to 29.Google Scholar
20. Brush, L. H., pp. 68 to 75.Google Scholar
21. Brush, L. H., pp. 76 to 77.Google Scholar
22. Brush, L. H., pp. 77 to 81.Google Scholar
23. Molecke, M. A., Test Plan: WIPP Bin-Scale CH TRU Waste Tests (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1990a).Google Scholar
24. Molecke, M. A., Test Plan: WIPP In Situ Alcove CH TRU Waste Tests (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1990b).Google Scholar
25. Engineered Alternatives Task Force, Recommended Initial Waste Forms for the WIPP Experimental Test Program, D0E/WIPP 90–009 (US Department of Energy, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Carlsbad, NM, 1990).Google Scholar