Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:28:17.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of Waste Performance in a Geologic Repository

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Paul L. Chambre'  and
Thomas H. Pigford
Paul L. Chambre'
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Thomas H. Pigford
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Get access

Abstract

The rate of dissolution of low-solubility species from waste forms in a geologic repository can be calculated from a theoretical analysis of the time-dependent rate of mass transfer by diffusion and convection Into the groundwater surrounding the waste, assuming a concentration at the waste-form surface eanal to the solubility of the radioelement. The analytical solutions for time-dependent mass transfer are reduced to asymptotic steady-state approximations valid over specified ranges of repository conditions. The predicted steady-state dissolution rates are considerably below those observed in laboratory leaching experiments with borosilicate glass and with other waste forms, indicating that the solid-liquid chemical reaction rates measured in the laboratory experiments are greater than the rates of diffusive-convective mass transfer in the concentration boundary layer surrounding the waste form in a geologic repository. It is shown that the time to reach steady-state dissolution can be as short as a few years, if convective mass transfer in the concentration boundary layer is important, to many thousands of years, If mass transfer is mainly by diffusion in the groundwater. The steady-state mass transfer rate can be Increased, and the time to reach steady state decreased, by sufficiently short half lives of the dissolving species. The theory has been extended to Include the effect of backfill on the steady-state mass transfer from the waste-form surface into moving groundwater.

The mass-transfer theory has been extended to include the effect of time-dependent solubilities, diffusion coefficients, and retardation coefficients, which provides a means of calculating the time-dependent dissolution of lowsolubility species from waste exDosed to groundwater during the Period of repository heating. The effects of timetemperature transient dissolution on far-field concentrations and cumulative release are calculated.

The transient and steady-state diffusion of radionuclides through a finite backfill layer separating a finite waste solid and porous rock has been analyzed, Including the effects of radioactive decay. Previous backfill analyses have neglected radioactive decay and have assumed an infinite amount of backfill. The results show that the break-through time and rate of radionuclide release depend on properties of the backfill and surrounding rock and on the waste form dimensions.

Laboratory tests have been designed to validate these theoretical analyses of diffusive-convective mass transfer with solubility-limit boundary conditions. Preliminary tests are now underway at the Battelle Northwest Laboratory.

Peak far-field concentrations of more soluble radionuclides such as cesium-135, with suitably long radionuclide transport times and sufficiently large axial dispersion, are shown to he insensitive to dissolution rate. Equivalent phenomena occur in fracture-flow radionuclide transport.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 26: Symposium D – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII , 1983 , 985
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pigford, T. H., Blomeke, J. O., Brekke, T. L., Cowan, G. A., Falconer, W. E., Grant, N. J., Johnson, J. R, Matusek, J. M., Parizek, R. R., Pigford, R. L., White, D. E., “A Study of the Isolation System for Geologic Disposal of Radioactive Wastes”, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (April, 1983).Google Scholar
2. Pigford, T. H., “The National Research Council Study of the Isolation System for Geologic Disposal of Radioactive Wastes'”, The Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Materials Research Society,Boston, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hench, L. L., Clark, D. E., and Yen-Bower, E. L., “Corrosion of Glasses and Glass-Ceramics,” Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management 1, 59–75 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Altenhein, F. K., , F. K., Lutze, W., and Ewing, R. C., “Long-Term Radioactivity Release From Solidified High-Level Waste, Part I: An Approach to Evaluating Experimental Data,” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management,Lutze, V. W., Ed., North-Holland (1982).Google Scholar
5. Malow, G., “The Mechanisms for Hydrothermal Leaching of Nuclear Waste Glasses: Properties and Evaluation of Surface Layers,” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Lutze, V. W., Ed., North-Holland (1982).Google Scholar
6. Wicks, G. G., , G. G., Mosley, W. C., Whitkop, P. G., and Saturday, K. A., “Durability of Simulated Waste Glass – Effects of Pressure and Formation of Surface Layers,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 49, pp. 413–428 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Cousens, D. R., Lewis, R. A., Myhra, S., Segall, R. L., Smart, R. St. C., and Turner, P. S., “The Chemical Durability of Some HLR Glasses: Effects of Hydrothermal Conditions and Ionizing Radiation,” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Lutze, V. W., Ed., North-Holland (1982).Google Scholar
8. Westsik, J. H. Jr., and Peters, R. D., “Time and Temperature Dependence of the Leaching of a Simulated High-Level Waste Glass,”, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Moore, J. G., ed., Vol. 3 (Plenum, New York 1981).Google Scholar
9. Rai, , , D., and Strickert, R. G., “Maximum Concentrations of Actinides in Geologic Media,” Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc., 33, p. 185 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Kuhn, W. L., Peters, R. D., and Simonson, S. A., “Development of a Leach Model for a Commercial Nuclear Waste Glass,” Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management 3, 13 (1982).Google Scholar
11. Wicks, G. G. and Wallace, R. M., “Leachability of Waste Glass Systems-- Physical and Mathematical Models,” DP-MS-82-18, E. I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Savannah River Plant, Aiken, S. C. (1982).Google Scholar
12. Chambre', P. L., Pigford, T. H., Zavoshy, S., “Solubility-Limited Dissolution Rate in Groundwater,” Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc., 40, p. 153 (1982).Google Scholar
13. Chambre', P. L., Pigford, T. H., Zavoshy, S., “Solubility-Limited Fractional Dissolution Rate of Vitrified Waste in Groundwater,” Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc., 33, p. 185 (1980).Google Scholar
14. Chambre', P. L., Pigford, T. H., Fujita, A., Kanki, T., Kobayashi, R., Lung, H., Ting, D., Sato, Y., and Zavoshy, S. J., “Analytical Performance Models For Geologic Repositories,” LBL-14842 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Chambre', P. L., Lung, H. C., Pigford, T. H., “Mass Transport From a Waste Emplaced in Backfill and Rock”, Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc., 44, p. 112 (1983).Google Scholar
16. Neretnieks, S. K., “Diffusion in Crystalline Rocks”, Proc. Fifth International Symposium on the Scientific Basis for Radioactive Waste Management, Berlin (June, 1982).Google Scholar
17. Skagius, K. and Neretnieks, I., “Diffusion in Crystalline Rocks”, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management Lutze, V, W., Ed., 509–518, North Holland (1982).Google Scholar
18. Bradbury, M. H., Lever, D., and Kinsey, D., “Aqueous Phase Diffusion in Crystalline Rock”, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Lutze, V. W., Ed., 569–578, North-Holland (1982).Google Scholar
19. Fournier, R. O., and Power, J. J., Amer. Minerol. 61, 1052–56, 1977.Google Scholar
20. Krauskopf, K., Stanford University, Private Communication (1982).Google Scholar
21. McVay, G. L., Bradley, D. J., Kircher, J. F., “Elemental Release From Glass and Spent Fuel, ONWI-275 (October, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Sato, Y., Fujita, A., Chambre', P. L., and Pigford, T. H., “Effect of Solubility-Limited Dissolution on the Migration of Radionuclide Chains,” Transactions of the American Nuclear Society 43, 64 (1982).Google Scholar
23. Allard, B., “Solubilities of Actinides in Neutral or Basic Solutions,” Proc. Actinides 81, Asilomar (September, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Avogadro, A., Murray, C. N., DePlano, A., Bidoglio, G., “Underground Migration of Long-Lived Radionuclides Leached From a Borosilicate Glass Matrix,” IAEA-SM-257 (July 1981).Google Scholar
25. Eichholz, G. G., and Craft, T. F., “Subsurface Migration of Radioactive Waste Materials by Particulate Transport,” Report, Georgia Inst. Tech. (February, 1980).Google Scholar
26. Thomason, H. P., Avery, R. G., and Ramsay, J. D. F., Harwell Report AERE-R 10479 (1982).Google Scholar
27. Nowak, E. J., “The Backfill Barrier as a Component in a Multiple Barrier Nuclear Waste Isolation System”, SAND 79-1109, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuqerque, N. Mex. (October 1979).Google Scholar
28. Ahn, T. M., Czyscinski, K. S., Franz, E. M., Klamut, C. J., Lee, B. S., McIntyre, N. S., Swyler, K. J., Wilke, R. J., “Nuclear Waste Management Technical Support in the Development of Nuclear Waste Form Criteria for the NRC,” NUREG/CR-2333, Vol. 4 (1982).Google Scholar
29. Ahn, T. M., Dayal, R., and Wilke, R. J., “Evaluation of Backfill as a Barrier to Radionuclide Migration in a High Level Waste Repository,” Appendix A in: Dayal, , et al. , “Nuclear Waste Management Technical Support in the Development of Nuclear Waste Form Criteria for the NRC,” Task 1, Waste Package Overview, NUREG/CR-2333, BNL-NUREG-51458, Vol. 1 (1982).Google Scholar
30. Lung, H. C., Chambre', P. L., Pigford, T. H., “Nuclide Migration in Backfill With a Nonlinear Sorption Isotherm”, Trans. Amer. Nuel. Soc., 45, 107 (November, 1983).Google Scholar
31. Chambre', P. L., Williams, W. J., Kim, C. L., Pigford, T. H., “Time-Temperature Dissolution and Radionuclide Transport,” UCB-NE-4033 (June, 1983).Google Scholar
32. Altenhofen, M. K., “Waste Package Heat-Transfer Analysis: Model Development and Temperature Estimates for Waste Packages in a Repository Located in Basalt,” RHO-BWI-ST-18 (October, 1981).Google Scholar
33. Harada, M., Chambre', P. L., Foglia, M., Higashi, K., Iwamoto, F., Leung, D., Pigford, T. H., and Ting, D., “Migration of Radionuclides Through Sorbing Media: Analytical Solutions – I,” LBL-10500 (February, 1980).Google Scholar
34. Crandall, J. L., Savannah River Laboratory, letter to Pigford, T. H., July, 1981.Google Scholar
35. Kobayashi, R., Sato, Y., Kanki, T., Chambre', P. L., Pigford, T. H., “Solubility-Limited Transport of Radionuclides Through Fractured Rock'”, Transactions of the American Nuclear Society 44, 113 (June 1983).Google Scholar
36. McGrail, B. P., Chick, L. A., McVay, G. L., “Initial Results for the Experimental Validation of a Nuclear Waste Repository Source Term Model”, Battelle Northwest Laboratory Report, PNL SA 12015, January, 1984.Google Scholar