Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:49:55.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polyethylene Oxide Nanofibers as Ultraviolet Sensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Saima Naz Khan
Affiliation:
[email protected], Ohio University, Chemistry and Bio-Chemistry, 158 Clippinger labs, Athens, OH, 45701, United States
Jeffrey J. Rack
Affiliation:
[email protected], Ohio University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 251B Clippinger labs, Athens, OH, 45701, United States
Aaron R. Rachford
Affiliation:
Ohio University, Chemistry and Bio-Chemistry, 158 Clippinger labs, Athens, OH, 45701, United States
Martin E. Kordesch
Affiliation:
[email protected], Ohio University, Physics and Astronomy, 251B Clippinger labs, Athens, OH, 45701, United States
Get access

Abstract

Using the electrospinning technique, we have prepared [Ru (pic) 2 (dmso) 2] doped-polyethylene oxide nanofibers for ultraviolet sensing. The diameter of the as-prepared fibers is in the range of 1μm-100nm. These fibers change color from pale yellow to orange when exposed to ultraviolet light (wavelength∼350nm) and return to their original color after approximately 2-3 days. The intensity of the color increases with an increased time of exposure to UV. The color changing behavior in the nanofibrous mat is almost the same as that in cast films prepared from the same solutions. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) studies of the fibers show that the morphology of the fibers remains unchanged after exposure to UV.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Formhals, A., U.S Patent No. 1 975 504 (1934)Google Scholar
2. Reneker, D.H. and Chun, I., Nanotechnology 7, 216–23 (1996)Google Scholar
3. Deitzel, J.M., Kleinmeyer, J., Harris, D., Tan, N. C. B., Polymer 42, 261–72 (2001)Google Scholar
4. Doshi, J., Reneker, D.H., J. Electrost. 35, 151 (1995)Google Scholar
5. Gibson, P.W., Schreuder-Gibson, H.L., Riven, D., AIChE J. 45, 190 (1999)Google Scholar
6. KO, F.K., Laurencin, C.T., Borden, M.D., Reneker, D.H., The dynamics of cell-fiber architecture interaction. Proc Ann Mtg Biomater Res Soc (Apr 11 1998)Google Scholar
7. Sadek, Abu Z., Baker, Christina O., Powell, David A., Wlodarski, Wojtek, Kaner, Richard B., and Kalantar-zadeh, Kourosh,IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, VOL. 7, NO. 2, 2007 Google Scholar
8. Rackford, A. A., Peterson, J. L., Rack, J. J., Inorg. Chem. 44, 80658075 (2005)Google Scholar
9. Rackford, A. A., Peterson, J. L., Rack, J. J., Inorg. Chem. 45, 59535960 (2006)Google Scholar