Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:46:08.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pole Figure Analysis of Epitaxial Films of ZnO:2wt%Al Grown on Sapphire Substrates by RF Magnetron Sputtering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

P. Kuppusami
Affiliation:
Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, 603102 Kalpakkam, India
S. Fiechter
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut, dept. Solar Energetics, D-14109 Berlin, Glienicker Str. 100, Germany
K. Ellmer
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut, dept. Solar Energetics, D-14109 Berlin, Glienicker Str. 100, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Aluminium-doped zinc oxide (ZnO:Al) films have been grown on c-plane (001) and a-plane (110) sapphire by RF magnetron sputtering from a ceramic target. The films grew epitaxially, even at room temperature. However, the crystalline quality depends both on the substrate temperature as well as on the sapphire orientation. The best films, proved by X-ray diffraction (rocking curves and pole figure measurements) were grown on (110)-oriented sapphire in the temperature range 473 to 773 K. The minimum rocking curve half width was about 0.75 °. By Rutherford backscattering analysis it could be shown, that the films exhibit a significant variation of the defect density over the film thickness. The highest density, as expected, is observed at the interface sapphire/ZnO:Al. Films grown on (001)-oriented sapphire have higher rocking curve half widths (about 1.3 °) and exhibit sometimes two types of domains in the same film twisted by 30 °.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hartnagel, H.L., Dawar, A. L., Jain, A. K. and Jagadish, C., Semiconducting Transparent Thin Films (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 1995).Google Scholar
2. Minami, T., MRS Bull. 25, 38 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Gordon, R. G., MRS Bull. 25, 52 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Galli, G. and Coker, J. E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 16, 439 (1970).Google Scholar
5. Ma, J., Li, F., Ma, H. and Li, S., Thin Solid Films 279, 213 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Igasaki, Y. and Saito, H., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 2190 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Cebulla, R., Wendt, R. and Ellmer, K., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 1087 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Minami, T., Miyata, T., Yamamoto, T. and Toda, H., J. Vac. Sci. Techn. A 18, 1584 (2000).Google Scholar
9. Ryu, Y. R., Zhu, S., Wrobel, J. M., Jeong, H. M., Miceli, P. F. and White, H. W., J. Cryst. Growth 216, 326 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Ohkubo, I., Ohtomo, A., Onishi, T., Mastumoto, Y., Koinuma, H. and Kawasaki, M., Surf. Sci. 443, L1043 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Nakahara, K., Tanabe, T., Takasu, H., Fons, P., Iwata, K., Yamada, A., Matsubara, K., Hunger, R. and Niki, S., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 250 (2001).Google Scholar
12. Ellmer, K., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 34, 3097 (2001).Google Scholar
13. Kuppusami, P., Diesner, K., Sieber, I. and Ellmer, K., in MRS Spring Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2002), p. accepted.Google Scholar