Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:44:24.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physicochemistry of the Tomb of Nefertari, Egypt.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. E. Smeaton  and
George Burns
J. E. Smeaton
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Department of Chemistry, 80 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M5S 1A1
George Burns
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Department of Chemistry, 80 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M5S 1A1
Get access

Abstract

The Tomb of Nefertari, no. 66, Valley of the Queens, is an internationally known monument of historic and artistic importance; it is considere d one of the most beautiful of the Royal Egyptian tombs. The fragility of its plaster along with its ubiquitous sodium chloride crystals and microcrystals have complicated its conservation and restoration. In order to determine the optimum pathway for its conservation, the physicochemical processes which occur now in this Tomb must be well understood. To improve this understanding, samples of plaster taken from the Tomb have been analyzed using Differential Scanning Calorimetry and X-ray Diffraction and have been shown to be fully dehydrated; previous findings suggest that this is not the case in all contemporary Royal tombs. Although we are not aware of any kinetic study of gypsum dehydration in the solid state, the presence of anhydrite in the Tomb of Nefertari suggests that the CaSO4 ·2H2O → CaSO4 + 2H2O reaction is catalyzed. It is reasoned that finely-dispersed sodium chloride crystals act as effective catalysts in this reaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 123: Symposium L – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology I , 1988 , 299
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. George, Burns, Wilson-Yang, K.M. and Smeaton, J.E., in Advances in Chemistry Series no. 220, Archaeological Chemistry IV. (ACS Books, 1988, in press).Google Scholar
2. Goedicke, H. and Thausing, G., Nofretari. (Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanhalt, Graz, Austria, 1971).Google Scholar
3. Plenderlith, H.J., Mora, P., Torraca, G., and Guichen, G. de, UNESCO Consultant Report, Contract No. 33.591, 1970.Google Scholar
4. Wilson-Yang, K.M, Billard, T.C. and George, Burns, The SSEA Journal 12 (1), 9 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Stoppelaere, A., Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Egypte 40, 941 (1942).Google Scholar
6. Saleh, S.A., in Wall Paintines of the Tomb of Nefertari, edited by Corzo, M.A. (The Egyptian Antiquities Organization and the Getty Conservation Institute, 1987), p. 94.Google Scholar
7. Ridge, M.J. and Beretka, J., Rev. Pure Appl. Chem. 19, 17 (1969).Google Scholar
8. Knacke, O. and Gans, W., Zeit. Physik. Chem. Neue Folge 104, 41 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Blount, C.W. and Dickson, F.W., Am. Mineral. 52, 171 (1973).Google Scholar
10. Lucas, A., Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Egypte 24, 12 (1924).Google Scholar
11. Posnjak, E., Am. J. Sci. 35A, 247 (1938).Google Scholar
12. Deckers, J.M., Lash, J.E. and George, Burns, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 93 (4), 271 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Billo, S.M., J. Pet. Geol. 10 (1), 73 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Moiola, R.J. and Glover, E.D., Am. Mineral. 50, 2063 (1965).Google Scholar
15. Hill, C.A., NSS Bull. 42, 126 (1979).Google Scholar
16. Hannay, N.B., Solid State Chemistry, (Prentice-Hall Inc., 1967), p. 136.Google Scholar