Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:45:53.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physical Self-Assembly And Nano-Patterning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

T.-M. Lu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Applied Physics and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180–3590
D.-X. Ye
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Applied Physics and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180–3590
T. Karabacak
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Applied Physics and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180–3590
Get access

Abstract

It is known that oblique angle deposition (or glancing angle deposition) can create 3D architectures that are otherwise difficult to produce using the conventional lithographic techniques. The technique relies on a self-assembly mechanism originated from a physical shadowing effect during deposition. In this paper we show examples of 3D nanostructures obtained by this oblique angle deposition on a templated substrate with regularly spaced pillar seeds. We show that common to this technique is the phenomenon of side-way growth on the seeds. The side-way growth leads to a fan-like structure at the initial stages of growth if the incident oblique angle is fixed during growth. Simulations based on a steering effect due to the attractive force between the incoming atom and the existing atoms on the surface produce a fanlike structure similar to that observed experimentally. We show that a two-phase substrate rotation scheme during deposition can dramatically reduce this fan-out effect and can lead to uniform and isolated columns.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Robbie, K., Brett, M.J., and Lakhtakia, A., Nature 384, 616 (1996).Google Scholar
[2] Robbie, K., Sit, J.C., and Brett, M.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16, 1115 (1998).Google Scholar
[3] Lakhtakia, A. and Messier, R., Optics & Photonics News 12, 27 (2001).Google Scholar
[4] Messier, R., Venugopal, V.C., and Sunal, P.D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 18, 1538 (2000).Google Scholar
[5] Suzuki, M. and Taga, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 90, 5599 (2001).Google Scholar
[6] Zhao, Y.-P., Ye, D.-X., Wang, G.-C., and Lu, T.-M., Nano. Lett. 2, 351 (2002).Google Scholar
[7] Ye, D.-X., Karabacak, T., Lim, B.K., Wang, G.-C., and Lu, T.-M., Nanotechnology 15, 817 (2004).Google Scholar
[8] Kundt, A., Ann. Phys. Chem. Lpz. 27, 59 (1886).Google Scholar
[9] Young, N. O. and Kowal, J., Nature 183, 104 (1959).Google Scholar
[10] Karabacak, T., Wang, G.-C., and Lu, T.-M., J. Appl. Phys. 94, 7723 (2003).Google Scholar
[11] Karabacak, T., Singh, J. P., Zhao, Y.-P., Wang, G.-C., and Lu, T.-M., Phys. Rev. B 68, 125408 (2003).Google Scholar
[12] Barabasi, A.-L. and Stanley, H. E., Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995), p.20.Google Scholar
[13] Seo, J., Kwon, S.-M., Kim, H.-Y., and Kim, J.-S., Phys. Rev. B 67, 121402 (2003).Google Scholar
[14] Amar, J. G., Phys. Rev. B 67, 165425 (2003).Google Scholar
[15] Jensen, M.O. and Brett, M.J., Appl. Phys. A (2004), online.Google Scholar
[16] Main, E., Karabacak, T., and Lu, T.-M., J. Appl. Phys. 95, 4346 (2004).Google Scholar