Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:53:16.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photoluminescence (PL) and Optically Detected Magnetic Resonance (ODMR) Study of Visible Light Emission from Porous Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

P. A. Lane
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory - USDOE and Physics Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA S0011
L. S. Swanson
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory - USDOE and Physics Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA S0011
J. Shinar
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory - USDOE and Physics Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA S0011
S. Chumbley
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory - USDOE and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
Get access

Abstract

The photoluminescence (PL) and X-band ODMR of porous Si layers is described and discussed. The layers were prepared by anodizing the (100) face of a Si wafer at 20 mA/cm2 in 20% HF for 5 mai and passively soaking them in 36% HF for up to 10 hrs. The PL was broad and featureless, extending from ˜1.5 to ˜2.1 eV and peaking at 1.68 eV. Its intensity slightly increased upon cooling to 90 K, and then strongly decreased at lower temperatures. A ˜20 G wide asymmetric PL-enhancing ODMR was observed at g ˜2.0031 ±I 0.0009, which could be fit to a sum of two Gaussians. Their g-values were slightly temperature dependent. The ODMR intensity strongly decreased with increasing temperature, and was unobservable above ˜80 K. The results are compared to the optical properties of hydrogenated amorphous Si.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Canham, L. T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1046 (1990).Google Scholar
2. This volume.Google Scholar
3. Cullis, A. G. and Canham, L. T., Nature 353, 335 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Jung, K. H., Shih, S., Campbell, J. C., Kwong, D. L., George, T., Lin, T. L., Liu, H. Y., Zavada, J., Novak, S., this volume.Google Scholar
5. Fathauer, R. W., George, T., Kzendzov, A., Lin, T.-L., Pike, W. T., and Vasquez, R. P., this volume. Google Scholar
6. Weber, J., Brandt, M. S., Fuchs, H. D., and Stutzmann, M., this volume. Google Scholar
7. Cavenett, B. C., Adv. Phys. 30, 475 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Boulitrop, F., Phys. Rev. B 28, 6192 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Glaser, E., Kennedy, T. A., Sillmon, R. S., and Spencer, M. G., Phys. Rev. B 40, 3447 (1989); T. A. Kennedy and E. Glaser, J. Electron. Mater. 20, 49 (1991); E. R. Glaser et al., Phys. Rev. B 43, 14540 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Swanson, L. S., Shinar, J., and Yoshino, K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1140 (1990); L. S. Swanson, P. A. Lane, J. Shinar, and F. Wudl, Phys. Rev. B 44, 10617 (1991); L. S. Swanson, Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Naylor, D. L., Lee, S., Pincenti, J., Bouma, B., this volume. Google Scholar
12. Perry, C. H.. Lu, F., Namavar, F., and Kalkoran, N. M., this volume. Google Scholar