Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:33:41.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photoinduced Space Charge Effects on Current Noise in Photoconducting Insulators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A. Carbone
Affiliation:
Dip.di Fisica, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
P. Mazzetti
Affiliation:
Dip.di Fisica, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
Get access

Abstract

A set of experimental measurements concerning both current noise and conductance relaxation curves in CdS and CdSe photoconductors has shown the existence of a relationship between the noise power spectrum and the Fourier transform of the phototransient curve. Some of these experimental results have already been published. It appears that at least two different noise components contribute to the total power spectrum. The first component, which dominates the low frequency part of tile spectrum, is strictly related to the behaviour of the relaxation curve. Indeed, it can be attributed to the fluctuation of the photoinduced positive trapped charge and consequently of the potential barrier at the interface electrode-photoconductive material. The second component, on the contrary, is practically independent of the light wavelength, and represents an intrinsic noise component related to the generation-recombination and trapping processes within the photoconductor. In this paper we present a theory accounting for both the photoinduced and the intrinsic noise component. This theory fits well to the experimental data concerning the dependence of noise on light intensity and wavelength, using the parameters obtained from the phototransient and photoconductance measurements performed on thle same specimens. It also gives tile correct order of magnitude of the measured absolute value of the noise power spectrum.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Van Vliet, K.M., Blok, J., Physica, 22, 231, (1956).Google Scholar
2. Petritz, R.L., Phys.Rev. 104, 1508, (1956)Google Scholar
3. Smith, D.L., J.Appl. Phys. 53, 7051, (1982)Google Scholar
5. Van Vliet, K.M., Blok, J., Ris, C. and Steketee, J., Physica, 22, 723, (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Kruizinga, S. and Zijistra, R.J.J., Phys.Letters 28 A, 399, (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Carbone, A., Demichelis, F., Mazzetti, P., Proc. of 10th Int. Conf. on Noise Phys. Syst.,285, Budapest, (1989).Google Scholar
8. Mazzetti, P., Il Nuovo Cimento,31, 88, (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Carbone, A., Demichelis, F., Mazzetti, P., Proc. of 1 lth hIt. Conf. on Noise Phys. Syst.,317, Kyoto, (1989).Google Scholar
10. Ziel, A. Van der, Fluctuation Phenomena in Semi-Conductors, (Butterworth Scientific Publications, London, 1959) p. 53.Google Scholar
11. Bube, R. H., Photoconductivity of Solids, (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, London) p.269 Google Scholar